The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytic Light Curves of Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media
Open accessAbstract
Assuming an adiabatic evolution of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) remnant interacting with an external medium, we calculate the injection, cooling, and absorption break frequencies and the afterglow flux for plausible orderings of the break and observing frequencies. The analytical calculations are restricted to a relativistic remnant and, in the case of collimated ejecta, to the phase where there is an insignificant lateral expansion. Results are given for both a homogeneous external medium and a wind ejected by the GRB progenitor. We compare the afterglow emission at different observing frequencies, for each type of external medium. It is found that observations at submillimeter frequencies during the first day provide the best way of discriminating between the two models. By taking into account the effect of inverse Compton (IC) scatterings on the electron cooling, a new possible time dependence of the cooling break is identified. The signature of the upscattering losses could be seen in the optical synchrotron emission from a GRB remnant interacting with a preejected wind, as a temporary mild flattening of the afterglow decay. The upscattered radiation itself should be detected in the soft X-ray emission from GRB remnants running into denser external media, starting a few hours after the main event.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves
Blandford, R. D., & McKee, C. F. (1976) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.861619 · Cited by 1,215
Cited by
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Self-citationGAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
A short γ-ray burst apparently associated with an elliptical galaxy at redshift z = 0.225
Gehrels, N., Sarazin, C. L., O'Brien, P. T., Zhang, B., Barbier, L., Barthelmy, S. D., Blustin, A., Burrows, D. N., Cannizzo, J., Cummings, J. R., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04142 · Cited by 599
Kann, D. A., Klose, S., Zhang, B., Malesani, D., Nakar, E., Pozanenko, A., Wilson, A. C., Butler, N. R., Jakobsson, P., Schulze, S., et al. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/2/1513 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Panaitescu, A., & Kumar, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 543
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-76
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2070549958
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analytic Light Curves of Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/317090
- The paper
- Panaitescu, A., & Kumar, P. (2000). Analytic Light Curves of Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/317090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.