Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analytic Light Curves of Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media

Open access
Panaitescu, A., Kumar, P.·2000·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Assuming an adiabatic evolution of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) remnant interacting with an external medium, we calculate the injection, cooling, and absorption break frequencies and the afterglow flux for plausible orderings of the break and observing frequencies. The analytical calculations are restricted to a relativistic remnant and, in the case of collimated ejecta, to the phase where there is an insignificant lateral expansion. Results are given for both a homogeneous external medium and a wind ejected by the GRB progenitor. We compare the afterglow emission at different observing frequencies, for each type of external medium. It is found that observations at submillimeter frequencies during the first day provide the best way of discriminating between the two models. By taking into account the effect of inverse Compton (IC) scatterings on the electron cooling, a new possible time dependence of the cooling break is identified. The signature of the upscattering losses could be seen in the optical synchrotron emission from a GRB remnant interacting with a preejected wind, as a temporary mild flattening of the afterglow decay. The upscattered radiation itself should be detected in the soft X-ray emission from GRB remnants running into denser external media, starting a few hours after the main event.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/317090

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Panaitescu, A., & Kumar, P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2000-11
Volume
543
Issue
1
Pages
66-76
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2070549958
Cited by
439
References
1
FWCI
16.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analytic Light Curves of Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/317090
The paper
Panaitescu, A., & Kumar, P. (2000). Analytic Light Curves of Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/317090

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.