The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis of Basal Angiosperms: Comparison and Combination with Molecular Data
Abstract
We have amassed structural data for 108 characters and 52 taxa of magnoliids and basal monocots and eudicots, including observations by P. K. Endress and A. Igersheim on flowers. These data were analyzed separately and in combination with rbcL, 18S, and atpB sequences. Besides confirming agreements between previous analyses of both kinds of data (reduction of Magnoliales to six families; relation of Piperaceae, Saururaceae, Lactoris, and Aristolochiaceae), trees based on this data set show shifts toward molecular results (separation of Illiciaceae and Schisandraceae from Winteraceae and of Amborella, Austrobaileya, Trimeniaceae, and Chloranthaceae from Laurales; relation of Winteraceae and Canellaceae) plus continued conflicts (association of Chloranthaceae with Amborella and Trimeniaceae and of Nymphaeales with monocots). In cases where molecular and morphological trees conflict, combined analyses of morphological and molecular data generally yield the same topologies as molecular analyses, but morphology overcomes weak molecular evidence in indicating that Chloranthaceae belong just above the basal grade, that monocots are related to Piperales, and that Lauraceae are linked with Hernandiaceae. If angiosperms are rooted by molecular data, chloranthoid leaf teeth, two‐trace nodes, columellar (not granular) pollen, and ascidiate carpels sealed by secretion are ancestral. Vesselless xylem is primitive in Amborella but secondary in Winteraceae and Trochodendraceae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/boj.12385 · Cited by 9,555
A metacalibrated time‐tree documents the early rise of flowering plant phylogenetic diversity
Magallón, S., Gómez‐Acevedo, S., Sánchez‐Reyes, L. L., & Hernández‐Hernández, T. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13264 · Cited by 1,040
Archaefructaceae, a New Basal Angiosperm Family
Sun, G., Ji, Q., Dilcher, D. L., Zheng, S., Nixon, K. C., & Wang, X. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069439 · Cited by 462
Sauquet, H., Ho, S. Y. W., Gandolfo, M. A., Jordan, G. J., Wilf, P., Cantrill, D. J., Bayly, M. J., Bromham, L., Brown, G. K., Carpenter, R. J., et al. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr116 · Cited by 423
Establishing a time‐scale for plant evolution
Clarke, J. T., Warnock, R. C. M., & Donoghue, P. C. J. (2011) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03794.x · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Doyle, J. A., & Endress, P. K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- S6
- Pages
- S121-S153
- ISSN
- 1058-5893 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5315
- OpenAlex
- W2180180520
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis of Basal Angiosperms: Comparison and Combination with Molecular Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/317578
- The paper
- Doyle, J. A., & Endress, P. K. (2000). Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis of Basal Angiosperms: Comparison and Combination with Molecular Data. International Journal of Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1086/317578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.