The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parent Stars of Extrasolar Planets. VI. Abundance Analyses of 20 New Systems
Open accessAbstract
The results of new spectroscopic analyses of 20 recently reported extrasolar planet parent stars are presented. The companion of one of these stars, HD 10697, has recently been shown to have a mass in the brown dwarf regime; we find [Fe/H] = +0.16 for it. For the remaining sample, we derive [Fe/H] estimates ranging from -0.41 to +0.37, with an average value of +0.18 ± 0.19. If we add the 13 stars included in the previous papers of this series and six other stars with companions below the 11 M J limit from the recent studies of Santos et al., we derive ⟨[Fe/H]⟩ = +0.17 ± 0.20. Among the youngest stars with planets with F or G0 spectral types, [Fe/H] is systematically larger than young field stars of the same Galactocentric distance by 0.15 to 0.20 dex. This confirms the recent finding of Laughlin that the most massive stars with planets are systematically more metal-rich than field stars of the same mass. We interpret these trends as supporting a scenario in which these stars accreted high-Z material after their convective envelopes shrunk to near their present masses. Correcting these young star metallicities by 0.15 dex still does not fully account for the difference in mean metallicity between the field stars and the full parent stars sample. The stars with planets appear to have smaller [Na/Fe], [Mg/Fe], and [Al/Fe] values than field dwarfs of the same [Fe/H]. They do not appear to have significantly different values of [O/Fe], [Si/Fe], [Ca/Fe], or [Ti/Fe], though. The claim made in Paper V that stars with planets have low [C/Fe] is found to be spurious, due to unrecognized systematic differences among published studies. When corrected for these differences, they instead display slightly enhanced [C/Fe] (but not significantly so). If these abundance anomalies are due to the accretion of high-Z matter, it must have a composition different from that of the Earth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378355a0 · Cited by 4,111
Time Evolution of the Magnetic Activity Cycle Period. II. Results for an Expanded Stellar Sample
Saar, S. H., & Brandenburg, A. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307794 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Adams, F. C., Hollenbach, D., Laughlin, G., & Gorti, U. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/421989 · Cited by 459
Tidal Dissipation in Rotating Giant Planets
Ogilvie, G. I., & Lin, D. N. C. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/421454 · Cited by 386
THE COMPOSITIONAL DIVERSITY OF EXTRASOLAR TERRESTRIAL PLANETS. I. IN SITU SIMULATIONS
Bond, J. C., O'Brien, D. P., & Lauretta, D. S. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/715/2/1050 · Cited by 308
Frequency of Debris Disks around Solar‐Type Stars: First Results from a Spitzer MIPS Survey
Bryden, G., Beichman, C. A., Trilling, D. E., Rieke, G. H., Holmes, E. K., Lawler, S. M., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Werner, M. W., Gautier, T. N., Blaylock, M., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/498093 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonzalez, G., Laws, C., Tyagi, S., & Reddy, B. E.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 432-452
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002876153
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parent Stars of Extrasolar Planets. VI. Abundance Analyses of 20 New Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/318048
- The paper
- Gonzalez, G., Laws, C., Tyagi, S., & Reddy, B. E. (2001). Parent Stars of Extrasolar Planets. VI. Abundance Analyses of 20 New Systems. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/318048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.