Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 879

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Density, Velocity, and Magnetic Field Structure in Turbulent Molecular Cloud Models

Open access
Ostriker, Eve C., Stone, James M., Gammie, Charles F.·2001·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We use three-dimensional (3D) numerical magnetohydrodynamic simulations to follow the evolution of cold, turbulent, gaseous systems with parameters chosen to represent conditions in giant molecular clouds (GMCs). We present results of three model cloud simulations in which the mean magnetic field strength is varied ( B 0 = 1.4-14 μG for GMC parameters), but an identical initial turbulent velocity field is introduced. We describe the energy evolution, showing that (1) turbulence decays rapidly, with the turbulent energy reduced by a factor 2 after 0.4-0.8 flow crossing times (~2-4 Myr for GMC parameters), and (2) the magnetically supercritical cloud models gravitationally collapse after time ≈6 Myr, while the magnetically subcritical cloud does not collapse. We compare density, velocity, and magnetic field structure in three sets of model "snapshots" with matched values of the Mach number ≈ 9,7,5. We show that the distributions of volume density and column density are both approximately log-normal, with mean mass-weighted volume density a factor 3-6 times the unperturbed value, but mean mass-weighted column density only a factor 1.1-1.4 times the unperturbed value. We introduce a spatial binning algorithm to investigate the dependence of kinetic quantities on spatial scale for regions of column density contrast (ROCs) on the plane of the sky. We show that the average velocity dispersion for the distribution of ROCs is only weakly correlated with scale, similar to mean size-line width distributions for clumps within GMCs. We find that ROCs are often superpositions of spatially unconnected regions that cannot easily be separated using velocity information; we argue that the same difficulty may affect observed GMC clumps. We suggest that it may be possible to deduce the mean 3D size-line width relation using the lower envelope of the 2D size-line width distribution. We analyze magnetic field structure and show that in the high-density regime n ≳ 10 3 cm -3 , total magnetic field strengths increase with density with logarithmic slope ~1/3-2/3. We find that mean line-of-sight magnetic field strengths may vary widely across a projected cloud and are not positively correlated with column density. We compute simulated interstellar polarization maps at varying observer orientations and determine that the Chandrasekhar-Fermi formula multiplied by a factor ~0.5 yields a good estimate of the plane-of sky magnetic field strength, provided the dispersion in polarization angles is ≲25°.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/318290

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 879

Metadata

Authors
Ostriker, E. C., Stone, J. M., & Gammie, C. F.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2001-01-10
Volume
546
Issue
2
Pages
980-1005
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2171003055
Cited by
879
References
0
FWCI
25.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density, Velocity, and Magnetic Field Structure in Turbulent Molecular Cloud Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/318290
The paper
Ostriker, E. C., Stone, J. M., & Gammie, C. F. (2001). Density, Velocity, and Magnetic Field Structure in Turbulent Molecular Cloud Models. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/318290

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.