The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acute Management of Dengue Shock Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of 4 Intravenous Fluid Regimens in the First Hour
Abstract
Dengue hemorrhagic fever is an important cause of morbidity among Asian children, and the more severe dengue shock syndrome (DSS) causes a significant number of childhood deaths. DSS is characterized by a massive increase in systemic capillary permeability with consequent hypovolemia. Fluid resuscitation is critical, but as yet there have been no large trials to determine the optimal fluid regimen. We undertook a randomized blinded comparison of 4 fluids (dextran, gelatin, lactated Ringer's, and "normal" saline) for initial resuscitation of 230 Vietnamese children with DSS. All the children survived, and there was no clear advantage to using any of the 4 fluids, but the longest recovery times occurred in the lactated Ringer's group. The most significant factor determining clinical response was the pulse pressure at presentation. A comparison of the colloid and crystalloid groups suggested benefits in children presenting with lower pulse pressures who received one of the colloids. Further large-scale studies, stratified for admission pulse pressure, are indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Monsieurs, K. G., Nolan, J. P., Bossaert, L. L., Greif, R., Maconochie, I. K., Nikolaou, N. I., Perkins, G. D., Soar, J., Truhlář, A., Wyllie, J., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038 · Cited by 915
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people
Lewis, S. R., Pritchard, M. W., Evans, D. J., Butler, A. R., Alderson, P., Smith, A. F., & Roberts, I. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000567.pub7 · Cited by 315
Moeller, C., Fleischmann, C., Thomas-Rueddel, D., Vlasakov, V., Rochwerg, B., Theurer, P., Gattinoni, L., Reinhart, K., & Hartog, C. S. (2016) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.04.011 · Cited by 159
Kleinman, M. E., de Caen, A. R., Chameides, L., Atkins, D. L., Berg, R. A., Berg, M. D., Bhanji, F., Biarent, D., Bingham, R., Coovadia, A. H., et al. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2972a · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Nhan, N. T., Phuong, C. X. T., Kneen, R., Wills, B., Van My, N., Phuong, N. T. Q., Van Thien, C., Nga, N. T. T., Simpson, J. A., Solomon, T., White, N. J., & Farrar, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-01-15
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-213
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2147976206
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acute Management of Dengue Shock Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of 4 Intravenous Fluid Regimens in the First Hour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/318479
- The paper
- Nhan, N. T., Phuong, C. X. T., Kneen, R., Wills, B., Van My, N., Phuong, N. T. Q., Van Thien, C., Nga, N. T. T., Simpson, J. A., Solomon, T., White, N. J., & Farrar, J. (2001). Acute Management of Dengue Shock Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of 4 Intravenous Fluid Regimens in the First Hour. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/318479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.