Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Acute Management of Dengue Shock Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of 4 Intravenous Fluid Regimens in the First Hour

Nhan, N. T., Phuong, C. X. T., Kneen, R., Wills, B., Van My, N., Phuong, N. T. Q., Van Thien, C., Nga, N. T. T., Simpson, J. A., Solomon, T., White, N. J., Farrar, J.·2001·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Dengue hemorrhagic fever is an important cause of morbidity among Asian children, and the more severe dengue shock syndrome (DSS) causes a significant number of childhood deaths. DSS is characterized by a massive increase in systemic capillary permeability with consequent hypovolemia. Fluid resuscitation is critical, but as yet there have been no large trials to determine the optimal fluid regimen. We undertook a randomized blinded comparison of 4 fluids (dextran, gelatin, lactated Ringer's, and "normal" saline) for initial resuscitation of 230 Vietnamese children with DSS. All the children survived, and there was no clear advantage to using any of the 4 fluids, but the longest recovery times occurred in the lactated Ringer's group. The most significant factor determining clinical response was the pulse pressure at presentation. A comparison of the colloid and crystalloid groups suggested benefits in children presenting with lower pulse pressures who received one of the colloids. Further large-scale studies, stratified for admission pulse pressure, are indicated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/318479

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Nhan, N. T., Phuong, C. X. T., Kneen, R., Wills, B., Van My, N., Phuong, N. T. Q., Van Thien, C., Nga, N. T. T., Simpson, J. A., Solomon, T., White, N. J., & Farrar, J.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2001-01-15
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
204-213
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2147976206
Cited by
344
References
0
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acute Management of Dengue Shock Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of 4 Intravenous Fluid Regimens in the First Hour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/318479
The paper
Nhan, N. T., Phuong, C. X. T., Kneen, R., Wills, B., Van My, N., Phuong, N. T. Q., Van Thien, C., Nga, N. T. T., Simpson, J. A., Solomon, T., White, N. J., & Farrar, J. (2001). Acute Management of Dengue Shock Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of 4 Intravenous Fluid Regimens in the First Hour. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/318479

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.