Cited by 448Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeNuclear physics research studies

Predictions for Self-Pollution in Globular Cluster Stars

Open access
Ventura, Paolo, D’Antona, Francesca, Mazzitelli, Italo, Gratton, Raffaele·2001·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Fully evolutionary models have been built to follow the phases of asymptotic giant branch evolution with mass loss for metal mass fractions from Z = 2 × 10 -4 to Z = 4 × 10 -3 . The hot bottom burning at the base of the convective envelope is followed by fully coupled nuclear burning and noninstantaneous mixing. The models also show the occurrence of a spontaneous (i.e., not induced by overshooting) third dredge-up. For the first time, we find that temperatures close to or even larger than 10 8 K are achieved at low Z ; the full CNO cycle operates at the base of the envelope, the 16 O abundance for the most metal-poor models of 4 and 5 M ☉ is drastically reduced, and sodium and aluminum production by proton capture on neon and magnesium can occur. Lithium is first largely produced in the envelope and then burned completely, so the average lithium abundance in the expelled envelope is a factor of up to 5 times smaller than the initial one, but it is never completely depleted. These results may be relevant for the evolution of primordial massive globular clusters; we suggest that the low-mass stars may have been polluted at the surface by accretion from the gas that was lost from the evolving intermediate-mass stars at early ages [(1-2) × 10 8 yr]. In this hypothesis, we should expect that the polluted stars show smaller abundances of oxygen, larger abundances of products of advanced nucleosynthesis (as Na and Al), and lower, but never negligible, abundances of lithium. The abundance spreads should be smaller in clusters of higher metallicities, where the lithium in the polluted stars could be larger than in the nonpolluted stars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/319496

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first stellar yields from detailed AGB models were published by Ventura et al. (2001) and Herwig (2004b) but for limited ranges of masses and/or metallicities.

    “The first stellar yields from detailed AGB models were published by Ventura et al. (2001) and Herwig (2004b) but for limited ranges of masses and/or metallicities.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ventura, P., D’Antona, F., Mazzitelli, I., & Gratton, R.
Affiliations
  • Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT)
  • Institute for Space Astrophysics and Planetology (IT)
  • Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2001-03-20
Volume
550
Issue
1
Pages
L65-L69
ISSN
0004-637X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143257080
Cited by
448
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 24
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
Keywords
globular cluster stars, self-pollution, hot bottom burning, third dredge-up, lithium depletion, oxygen abundance, CNO cycle, metal-poor stars, stellar mass loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review