Prophylactic antifungal therapy in the intensive care unit
Abstract
Antifungal prophylaxis is regularly used during treatment of patients with some cancers, as subgroups with high rates of invasive fungal infections are readily identified; for these patients, prophylaxis has been shown to be of value. High-risk liver transplant recipients also benefit from antifungal prophylaxis. Although the idea of extending this concept to the prevention of candidal infections in the larger population of critically ill patients who are seen in the intensive care unit (ICU) and who do not have neutropenia is attractive, implementation of this strategy is difficult because of the widely varying characteristics of patients in the ICU. Two studies have shown the benefit of such prophylaxis, but the benefit was shown only in selected groups of patients who had an unusually high risk for invasive candidiasis. Although the concept is sound, broad-scale implementation of antifungal prophylaxis would be premature and costly, both financially and with regard to resistance and toxicity. Investigations are needed to define and prove the utility of predictive tools for the identification of patients in the ICU who would benefit from prophylaxis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A few meta-analyses have suggested potential mortality benefits with fluconazole prophylaxis; however, with an incidence of 1% to 2% in most ICU populations, more than 200 patients would need to undergo prophylaxis to prevent 1 infection.
“A few meta-analyses have suggested potential mortality benefits with fluconazole prophylaxis; however, with an incidence of 1% to 2% in most ICU populations, more than 200 patients would need to undergo prophylaxis to prevent 1 infection.”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [185]
Although most C. norvegensis isolates to date have been from respiratory specimens, Sandven and colleagues have identified this species from blood, urine, and peritoneal fluid.
“Although most isolates to date have been from respiratory specimens, Sandven and colleagues (257, 259) have identified this species from blood, urine, and peritoneal fluid.”
From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem (2007) · cites this paper as [257]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 155
- Authors
- Weinstein, R. A., Rex, J. H., & Sobel, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Texas Medical Center (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rex, J. H.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04-15
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1191-1200
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2105124717
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
- Keywords
- antifungal prophylaxis, invasive candidiasis, intensive care unit, critically ill patients, invasive fungal infections, liver transplant recipients, cancer patients, predictive tools, antifungal resistance, antifungal toxicity, cost of prophylaxis
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Neoplasms, Neutropenia, Antibiotic Prophylaxis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review