The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining Leptokurtic Movement Distributions: Intrapopulation Variation in Boldness and Exploration
Abstract
Leptokurtic distributions of movement distances observed in field-release studies, in which some individuals move long distances while most remain at or near their release point, are a common feature of mobile animals. However, because leptokurtosis is predicted to be transient in homogeneous populations, persistent leptokurtosis suggests a population heterogeneity. We found evidence for a heterogeneity that may generate persistent leptokurtosis. We tested individuals of the Trinidad killifish Rivulus hartii for boldness in a tank test and released them back into their native stream. Boldness in the tank test predicted distance moved in the field releases, even after effects of size and sex were removed. Further, data from a 19-mo mark-recapture study showed that individual growth correlated positively with movement in a predator-threatened river zone where the Rivulus population is spatially fragmented and dispersal is likely to be a hazardous activity. In contrast, no such correlation existed in a predator-absent zone where the population is unfragmented. These results show that a behavioral trait, not discernible from body size or sex, contributes to dispersal and that a component of fitness of surviving "dispersers" is elevated above that of "stayers," a fundamental assumption or prediction of many models of the evolution of dispersal through hazardous habitat.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Cited by
Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview
Sih, A., Bell, A., & Johnson, J. C. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009 · Cited by 2,861
Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level
Réale, D., Garant, D., Humphries, M. M., Bergeron, P., Careau, V., & Montiglio, P.-O. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0208 · Cited by 1,446
Wolves influence elk movements: Behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park
Fortin, D., Beyer, H. L., Boyce, M. S., Smith, D. W., Duchesne, T., & Mao, J. S. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-0953 · Cited by 1,351
Clobert, J., Le Galliard, J., Cote, J., Meylan, S., & Massot, M. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01267.x · Cited by 1,232
McDougall, P. T., Réale, D., Sol, D., & Reader, S. M. (2006) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2005.00004.x · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraser, D. F., Gilliam, J. F., Daley, M. J., Le, A. N., & Skalski, G. T.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-135
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2009566431
- Cited by
- 658
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining Leptokurtic Movement Distributions: Intrapopulation Variation in Boldness and Exploration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/321307
- The paper
- Fraser, D. F., Gilliam, J. F., Daley, M. J., Le, A. N., & Skalski, G. T. (2001). Explaining Leptokurtic Movement Distributions: Intrapopulation Variation in Boldness and Exploration. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/321307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.