Evolution and Nucleosynthesis of Zero‐Metal Intermediate‐Mass Stars
Open accessAbstract
New stellar models with masses ranging between 4 and 8 M ☉ , Z = 0, and Y = 0.23 are presented. The models have been evolved from the pre-main sequence up to the asymptotic giant branch (AGB). At variance with previous claims, we find that these updated stellar models do experience thermal pulses in the AGB phase. In particular, we show the following:
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The yields of N are dominated by intermediate-mass stars that experience HBB.
“Figure 34 shows that the yields of N are dominated by intermediate-mass stars that experience HBB (see also Frost et al. 1998a; Chieffi et al. 2001; Pols et al. 2012).”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Chieffi et al. 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
“…http://mesa.sourceforge.net/. bility of explaining some of the abundances seen in CEMP stars (Hollowell et al. 1990; Fujimoto et al. 2000; Chieffi et al. 2001; Schlattl et al. 2001, 2002; Picardi et al. 2004; Weiss et al. 2004; Suda et al. 2004; Lau et al. 2009) including possible…”
BackgroundInfluentialMg isotopic ratios in giant stars of the globular cluster NGC 6752
Yong, D., Grundahl, F., Lambert, D. L., Nissen, P. E., & Shetrone, M. D. (2003) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030296 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
On variations in the fine-structure constant and stellar pollution of quasar absorption systems
Fenner, Y., Murphy, M. T., & Gibson, B. K. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08781.x · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chieffi, A., Dominguez, I., Limongi, M., & Straniero, O.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Space Astrophysics and Planetology (IT)
- Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2001-06-20
- Volume
- 554
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1159-1174
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2142401097
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- zero-metallicity stars, intermediate-mass stars, stellar evolution, nucleosynthesis, asymptotic giant branch, thermal pulses, stellar models, pre-main sequence, helium burning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
