Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Ωmwith the ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey

Open access
Borgani, Stefano, Rosati, Piero, Tozzi, Paolo, Stanford, S. A., Eisenhardt, Peter R., Lidman, Chris, Holden, Bradford, Della Ceca, Roberto, Norman, Colin, Squires, Gordon·2001·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We analyze the ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey (RDCS) to derive cosmological constraints from the evolution of the cluster X-ray luminosity distribution. The sample contains 103 galaxy clusters out to z ≃ 0.85 and flux limit F lim = 3 × 10 -14 ergs s -1 cm -2 (RDCS-3) in the [0.5-2.0] keV energy band, with a high-redshift extension containing four clusters at 0.90 ≤ z ≤ 1.26 and brighter than F lim = 1 × 10 -14 ergs s -1 cm -2 (RDCS-1). We assume cosmological models to be specified by the matter density parameter Ω m , the rms fluctuation amplitude at the 8 h -1 Mpc scale σ 8 , and the shape parameter for the cold dark matter-like power spectrum Γ. Model predictions for the cluster mass function are converted into the X-ray luminosity function in two steps. First, we convert mass into intracluster gas temperature by assuming hydrostatic equilibrium. Then, temperature is converted into X-ray luminosity by using the most recent data on the L X - T X relation for nearby and distant clusters. These include the Chandra data for six distant clusters at 0.57 ≤ z ≤ 1.27. From RDCS-3 we find Ω m = 0.35 and σ 8 = 0.66 for a spatially flat universe with a cosmological constant, with no significant constraint on Γ (errors correspond to 1 σ confidence levels for three fitting parameters). Even accounting for both theoretical and observational uncertainties in the mass-X-ray luminosity conversion, an Einstein-de Sitter model is always excluded at far more than the 3 σ level. We also show that the number of X-ray-bright clusters in RDCS-1 at z > 0.9 is expected from the evolution inferred at z < 0.9 data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/323214

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Borgani, S., Rosati, P., Tozzi, P., Stanford, S. A., Eisenhardt, P. R., Lidman, C., Holden, B., Della Ceca, R., Norman, C., & Squires, G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2001-11
Volume
561
Issue
1
Pages
13-21
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1620890260
Cited by
302
References
1
FWCI
28.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Ωmwith the ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/323214
The paper
Borgani, S., Rosati, P., Tozzi, P., Stanford, S. A., Eisenhardt, P. R., Lidman, C., Holden, B., Della Ceca, R., Norman, C., & Squires, G. (2001). Measuring Ωmwith the ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/323214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.