The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Ωmwith the ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey
Open accessAbstract
We analyze the ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey (RDCS) to derive cosmological constraints from the evolution of the cluster X-ray luminosity distribution. The sample contains 103 galaxy clusters out to z ≃ 0.85 and flux limit F lim = 3 × 10 -14 ergs s -1 cm -2 (RDCS-3) in the [0.5-2.0] keV energy band, with a high-redshift extension containing four clusters at 0.90 ≤ z ≤ 1.26 and brighter than F lim = 1 × 10 -14 ergs s -1 cm -2 (RDCS-1). We assume cosmological models to be specified by the matter density parameter Ω m , the rms fluctuation amplitude at the 8 h -1 Mpc scale σ 8 , and the shape parameter for the cold dark matter-like power spectrum Γ. Model predictions for the cluster mass function are converted into the X-ray luminosity function in two steps. First, we convert mass into intracluster gas temperature by assuming hydrostatic equilibrium. Then, temperature is converted into X-ray luminosity by using the most recent data on the L X - T X relation for nearby and distant clusters. These include the Chandra data for six distant clusters at 0.57 ≤ z ≤ 1.27. From RDCS-3 we find Ω m = 0.35 and σ 8 = 0.66 for a spatially flat universe with a cosmological constant, with no significant constraint on Γ (errors correspond to 1 σ confidence levels for three fitting parameters). Even accounting for both theoretical and observational uncertainties in the mass-X-ray luminosity conversion, an Einstein-de Sitter model is always excluded at far more than the 3 σ level. We also show that the number of X-ray-bright clusters in RDCS-1 at z > 0.9 is expected from the evolution inferred at z < 0.9 data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Cited by
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
The large-scale structure of the Universe
Springel, V., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04805 · Cited by 780
CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. II. SAMPLES AND X-RAY DATA REDUCTION
Vikhlinin, A., Burenin, R. A., Ebeling, H., Forman, W. R., Hornstrup, A., Jones, C., Kravtsov, A. V., Murray, S. S., Nagai, D., Quintana, H., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/2/1033 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Borgani, S., Rosati, P., Tozzi, P., Stanford, S. A., Eisenhardt, P. R., Lidman, C., Holden, B., Della Ceca, R., Norman, C., & Squires, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 561
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-21
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1620890260
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Ωmwith the ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/323214
- The paper
- Borgani, S., Rosati, P., Tozzi, P., Stanford, S. A., Eisenhardt, P. R., Lidman, C., Holden, B., Della Ceca, R., Norman, C., & Squires, G. (2001). Measuring Ωmwith the ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/323214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.