The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing Classical Community Models: Theoretical Consequences for Patterns of Diversity
Abstract
Abstract: Mechanisms proposed to explain the maintenance of species diversity within ecological communities of sessile organisms include niche differentiation mediated by competitive trade-offs, frequency dependence resulting from species-specific pests, recruitment limitation due to local dispersal, and a speciation-extinction dynamic equilibrium mediated by stochasticity (drift). While each of these processes, and more, have been shown to act in particular communities, much remains to be learned about their relative importance in shaping community-level patterns. We used a spatially-explicit, individual-based model to assess the effects of each of these processes on species richness, relative abundance, and spatial patterns such as the species-area curve. Our model communities had an order-of-magnitude more individuals than any previous such study, and we also developed a finite-size scaling analysis to infer the large-scale properties of these systems in order to establish the generality of our conclusions across system sizes. As expected, each mechanism can promote diversity. We found some qualitative differences in community patterns across communities in which different combinations of these mechanisms operate. Species-area curves follow a power law with short-range dispersal and a logarithmic law with global dispersal. Relative-abundance distributions are more even for systems with competitive differences and trade-offs than for those in which all species are competitively equivalent, and they are most even when frequency dependence (even if weak) is present. Overall, however, communities in which different processes operated showed surprisingly similar patterns, which suggests that the form of community-level patterns cannot in general be used to distinguish among mechanisms maintaining diversity there. Nevertheless, parameterization of models such as these from field data on the strengths of the different mechanisms could yield insight into their relative roles in diversity maintenance in any given community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship
Connor, E. F., & McCoy, E. D. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283438 · Cited by 2,313
Cited by
A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity
Ning, D., Deng, Y., Tiedje, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1904623116 · Cited by 1,255
Computational Improvements Reveal Great Bacterial Diversity and High Metal Toxicity in Soil
Gans, J., Wolinsky, M., & Dunbar, J. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1112665 · Cited by 1,207
Long-Distance Dispersal of Plants
Nathan, R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1124975 · Cited by 1,051
Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence
HUBBELL, S. P. (2005) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00965.x · Cited by 895
Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory
Hirzel, A. H., & Le Lay, G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01524.x · Cited by 873
Metadata
- Authors
- Chave, J., Muller‐Landau, H. C., & Levin, S. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2134126987
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing Classical Community Models: Theoretical Consequences for Patterns of Diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/324112
- The paper
- Chave, J., Muller‐Landau, H. C., & Levin, S. A. (2002). Comparing Classical Community Models: Theoretical Consequences for Patterns of Diversity. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/324112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.