The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A High‐Resolution X‐Ray Image of the Jet in M87
Open accessAbstract
We present the first high-resolution X-ray image of the jet in M87 using the Chandra X-Ray Observatory . There is clear structure in the jet and almost all of the optically bright knots are detected individually. The unresolved core is the brightest X-ray feature but is only 2-3 times brighter than knot A (12 3 from the core) and the inner knot HST-1 (1 0 from the core). The X-ray and optical positions of the knots are consistent at the 0 1 level, but the X-ray emission from the brightest knot (A) is marginally upstream of the optical emission peak. Detailed Gaussian fits to the X-ray jet one-dimensional profile show distinct X-ray emission that is not associated with specific optical features. The X-ray/optical flux ratio decreases systematically from the core, and X-ray emission is not clearly detected beyond 20'' from the core. The X-ray spectra of the core and the two brightest knots, HST-1 and A, are consistent with a simple power law ( S ν ∝ ν -α ) with α = 1.46 ± 0.05, practically ruling out inverse Compton models as the dominant X-ray emission mechanism. The core flux is significantly larger than expected from an advective accretion flow, and the spectrum is much steeper, indicating that the core emission may be due to synchrotron emission from a small-scale jet. The spectral energy distributions of the knots are well fitted by synchrotron models. The spectral indices in the X-ray band, however, are comparable to that expected in the Kardashev-Pacholczyk synchrotron model but are much flatter than expected in the pitch-angle isotropization model of Jaffe and Perola. The break frequencies derived from both models drop by factors of 10-100 with distance from the core.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole
The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., Alef, W., Asada, K., Azulay, R., Baczko, A.-K., Ball, D., Baloković, M., Barrett, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 · Cited by 4,205
Jet-Launching Structure Resolved Near the Supermassive Black Hole in M87
Doeleman, S. S., Fish, V. L., Schenck, D. E., Beaudoin, C., Blundell, R., Bower, G. C., Broderick, A. E., Chamberlin, R., Freund, R., Friberg, P., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1224768 · Cited by 414
Walker, R. C., Hardee, P. E., Davies, F. B., Ly, C., & Junor, W. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaafcc · Cited by 348
General relativistic magnetohydrodynamical simulations of the jet in M 87
Mościbrodzka, M., Falcke, H., & Shiokawa, H. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526630 · Cited by 323
Ressler, S. M., White, C. J., & Quataert, E. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad837 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, H. L., Miller, B. P., Davis, D. S., Perlman, E. S., Wise, M., Canizares, C. R., & Harris, D. E.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-01-10
- Volume
- 564
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 683-687
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2003210682
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A High‐Resolution X‐Ray Image of the Jet in M87. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/324396
- The paper
- Marshall, H. L., Miller, B. P., Davis, D. S., Perlman, E. S., Wise, M., Canizares, C. R., & Harris, D. E. (2002). A High‐Resolution X‐Ray Image of the Jet in M87. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/324396
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.