The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamically Close Galaxy Pairs and Merger Rate Evolution in the CNOC2 Redshift Survey
Open accessAbstract
We investigate redshift evolution in the galaxy merger and accretion rates, using a well-defined sample of 4184 galaxies with 0.12 ≤ z ≤ 0.55 and R C ≤ 21.5. We identify 88 galaxies in close (5 ≤ r p ≤ 20 h -1 kpc) dynamical (Δ v ≤ 500 km s -1 ) pairs. These galaxies are used to compute global pair statistics, after accounting for selection effects resulting from the flux limit, k -corrections, luminosity evolution, and spectroscopic incompleteness. We find that the number of companions per galaxy (for -21 ≤ M ≤ -18) is N c = 0.0321 ± 0.0077 at z = 0.3. The luminosity in companions, per galaxy, is L c = 0.0294 ± 0.0084 × 10 10 h 2 L ☉ . We assume that N c is proportional to the galaxy merger rate, while L c is directly related to the mass accretion rate. After increasing the maximum pair separation to 50 h -1 kpc and comparing with the low-redshift SSRS2 pair sample, we infer evolution in the galaxy merger and accretion rates of (1 + z ) 2.3±0.7 and (1 + z ) 2.3±0.9 , respectively. These are the first such estimates to be made using only confirmed dynamical pairs. When combined with several additional assumptions, this implies that approximately 15% of present epoch galaxies with -21 ≤ M B ≤ -18 have undergone a major merger since z = 1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Secular Evolution and the Formation of Pseudobulges in Disk Galaxies
Kormendy, J., & Kennicutt, R. C. (2004) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024 · Cited by 1,732
Sesana, A., Vecchio, A., & Colacino, C. N. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13682.x · Cited by 526
Galaxy ecology: groups and low-density environments in the SDSS and 2dFGRS
Balogh, M., Eke, V., Miller, C., Lewis, I., Bower, R., Couch, W., Nichol, R., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Baldry, I. K., Baugh, C., et al. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07453.x · Cited by 498
Toward an Understanding of the Rapid Decline of the Cosmic Star Formation Rate
Bell, E. F., Papovich, C., Wolf, C., Le Floc’h, E., Caldwell, J. A. R., Barden, M., Egami, E., McIntosh, D. H., Meisenheimer, K., Perez‐Gonzalez, P. G., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/429552 · Cited by 494
The Evolution of Galaxy Structure Over Cosmic Time
Conselice, C. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040037 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Patton, D. R., Pritchet, C. J., Carlberg, R. G., Marzke, R. O., Yee, H. K. C., Hall, P. B., Lin, H., Morris, S. L., Sawicki, M., Shepherd, C. W., & Wirth, G. D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-01-20
- Volume
- 565
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 208-222
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2051818512
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamically Close Galaxy Pairs and Merger Rate Evolution in the CNOC2 Redshift Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/324543
- The paper
- Patton, D. R., Pritchet, C. J., Carlberg, R. G., Marzke, R. O., Yee, H. K. C., Hall, P. B., Lin, H., Morris, S. L., Sawicki, M., Shepherd, C. W., & Wirth, G. D. (2002). Dynamically Close Galaxy Pairs and Merger Rate Evolution in the CNOC2 Redshift Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/324543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.