The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Excessive Natural Mulch on Development, Yield, and Structure of Native Grassland
Abstract
1. An upland prairie, undisturbed by mowing, grazing, or burning for 15 years, was studied. About 80% was covered with a nearly pure stand of Andropogon gerardi. Similar stands of Panicum virgatum and Sporobolus heterolepis each occupied about 9%. 2. A dense natural mulch, 4.5-8 inches deep and weighing 6-9 tons per acre, covered the deep loam soil. The mulch intercepted much precipitation but promoted more rapid infiltration of water which reached the soil and greatly retarded evaporation. It increased the organic matter of the surface soil 1.5-2% and nitrogen content 0.1% of its oven-dry weight. 3. Roots and rhizomes grew thickly below the mulch and mellowed the surface soil. Pore space was 61.7%, and volume-weight was 0.97. 4. Soil temperatures 22⚬-28⚬ F. lower under the mulch in May delayed growth about 3 weeks compared with plants where the mulch had been removed. Production of flower stalks was considerably later in all mulched grasses and also less in Andropogon. Flower stalks were abundant on all unmulched grasses. 5. Yields in June, July, and August were 53, 26, and 29% less from mulched stands of Andropogon, and 57, 55, and 26% less in Panicum than those from unmulched stands. 6. Consequences of the effects of the mulch upon the environment were the production of a nearly pure, but some-what thinner than normal, stand of Andropogon. The understory characteristic of upland prairie had all but disappeared. The usual mid grasses of upland were few or none. Only a few of the taller forbs remained. 7. Dense stands of Panicum with forbs characteristic of very moist sites were typical. Between the large bunches of prairie dropseed the deeply mulched soil was usually free of vegetation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858763 · Cited by 1,543
Seastedt, T. R., & Knapp, A. K. (1993) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285494 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Weaver, J. E., & Rowland, N. W.
- Venue
- Botanical Gazette
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1952-09
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0006-8071 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105465298
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Excessive Natural Mulch on Development, Yield, and Structure of Native Grassland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/335741
- The paper
- Weaver, J. E., & Rowland, N. W. (1952). Effects of Excessive Natural Mulch on Development, Yield, and Structure of Native Grassland. Botanical Gazette. https://doi.org/10.1086/335741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.