Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Comparison of the Amino Acid Complements of Floral and Extrafloral Nectars

Baker, Herbert G., Opler, Paul A., Baker, Irene·1978·Botanical Gazette

Abstract

The amino acid complements of extrafloral nectars from 34 species of tropical- and temperate-zone flowering plants were analyzed. Comparisons were made between 33 of these and analyses of floral nectars from 248 species. Also, in 21 cases, direct comparisons were made between extrafloral and floral nectars from the same species. The extrafloral nectar always differed in its complement of amino acids from that of the floral nectar. Certain acids that are only moderately frequently represented in the floral nectars are more frequently represented in the extrafloral nectars, most notably the cysteine group and lysine, asparagine, and tyrosine. Differences between extrafloral and floral nectar complements presumably relate to the function of the latter in feeding ant or wasp "guards," which may have different nutritional requirements from those of pollinators. Nonprotein amino acids are represented more frequently in extrafloral nectars, possibly indicating chemical protection of exposed nectar from "thieves." In Campsis x tagliabuana (Bignoniaceae) there are four distinguishable groups of extrafloral nectaries-on petioles, sepals, petals, and developing fruits-as well as conventional floral nectaries. The amino acid complements were slightly different in each case, but no statistically significant differences were found between the frequencies of individual amino acids in nectars from 21 species where the producing nectaries are in a vegetative part of the plant and nectars from 12 species where the extrafloral nectaries are restricted to the inflorescence. Until the biological functions of extrafloral nectar can be elucidated for each species in which it is produced, the full significance of variation between the amino acid complements cannot be appreciated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/337008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Baker, H. G., Opler, P. A., & Baker, I.
Venue
Botanical Gazette
Published
1978-09
Volume
139
Issue
3
Pages
322-332
ISSN
0006-8071 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056492404
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
15.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of the Amino Acid Complements of Floral and Extrafloral Nectars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/337008
The paper
Baker, H. G., Opler, P. A., & Baker, I. (1978). A Comparison of the Amino Acid Complements of Floral and Extrafloral Nectars. Botanical Gazette. https://doi.org/10.1086/337008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.