The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perceptions of Equity and the Distribution of Income
Abstract
This article develops a model in which quit rates, and thus the income distribution, depend on employee perceptions of the accuracy of employer assessments of individual productivity because these latter assessments affect wages. When employees believe that these assessments are accurate, income inequality tends to be high. The model can account for the negative correlation across some countries of inequality and the extent to which inequality is deemed to be excessive. It also fits the contrast in U.S. and French experiences concerning the tenure of highly educated workers with high wages relative to the tenure of lower‐paid workers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“If marginal products are unknown, or are only known to belong to relatively large intervals, then institutions, market power, and beliefs systems can naturally play a major role for pay determination (see Rotemberg 2002).”
From Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities (2014) · cites this paper as Rotemberg 2002
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1111/1468-0262.00020 · DOI
- Abraham Katharine G, 1987, American Economic Review, 77, 278
- 10.3386/w5605 · DOI
- 10.2307/1885099 · DOI · Paper page
- Atkinson Anthony B, 1995, Incomes and the Welfare State: Essays on Britain and Europe, edited by Anthony B. Atkinson
- Bernstein Jared, 1997, Monthly Labor Review, 120, 3
- 10.1111/1468-0262.00022 · DOI
- Burgess Simon, 1999, Performance Discussion Paper no. 416.
- 10.1111/1467-8543.00111 · DOI
- 10.1093/wber/10.3.565 · DOI
- Evans Geoffrey, 1993, International Social Attitudes: The Tenth BSA Report
- Farber Henry, 1998, Labor Statistics Measurement Issues, Studies in Income and Wealth, 60
- Feagin Joe R, 1975, Subordinating the Poor
- Hochschild Jennifer, 1981, Cambridge
- Kluegel James, 1986, Beliefs about Inequality
- 10.4159/harvard.9780674428522 · DOI
- 10.1086/261738 · DOI
- Moss David A, 1995, Case 9‐795‐064.
- 10.2307/2946692 · DOI
- 10.1177/001979399604900212 · DOI
- Uchitelle Louis, 1994, New York Times
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities
Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2014) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.6.1.230 · Cited by 713
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotemberg, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rotemberg, Julio J.
- Venue
- Journal of Labor Economics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-288
- ISSN
- 0734-306X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5307
- OpenAlex
- W2160821405
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Labor Economics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- income distribution, income inequality, quit rates, productivity analysis, wage determination, employee perceptions, job tenure, highly educated workers, wage inequality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review