Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Remarkable 3 Hour Thermonuclear Burst from 4U 1820−30

Open access
Strohmayer, Tod E., Brown, Edward F.·2002·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present a detailed observational and theoretical study of a ~3 hr long X-ray burst (the "superburst") observed by the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer ( RXTE ) from the low-mass X-ray binary 4U 1820-30. This is the longest X-ray burst ever observed from this source and perhaps one of the longest ever observed in great detail from any source. We show that the superburst is thermonuclear in origin. Its peak luminosity of ~3.4 × 10 38 ergs s -1 is consistent with the helium Eddington limit for a neutron star at ~7 kpc as well as the peak luminosity of other, shorter, thermonuclear bursts from the same source. The superburst begins in the decaying tail of a more typical (≈20 s duration) thermonuclear burst. These shorter, more frequent bursts are well-known helium flashes from this source. The level of the accretion-driven flux as well as the observed energy release of upward of 1.5 × 10 42 ergs indicate that helium could not be the energy source for the superburst. We outline the physics relevant to carbon production and burning on helium-accreting neutron stars and present calculations of the thermal evolution and stability of a carbon layer and show that this process is the most likely explanation for the superburst. Ignition at the temperatures in the deep carbon "ocean" requires more than 30 times the mass of carbon inferred from the observed burst energetics unless the He flash is able to trigger a deflagration from a much smaller mass of carbon. We show, however, that for large columns of accreted carbon fuel, a substantial fraction of the energy released in the carbon-burning layer is radiated away as neutrinos, and the heat that is conducted from the burning layer in large part flows inward, only to be released on timescales longer than the observed burst. Thus, the energy released during the event possibly exceeds that observed in X-rays by more than a factor of 10, making the scenario of burning a large mass of carbon at great depths consistent with the observed fluence without invoking any additional trigger. A strong constraint on this scenario is the recurrence time: to accrete an ignition column of 10 13 g cm -2 takes ~13/( /3 × 10 17 g s -1 ) yr. Spectral analysis during the superburst reveals the presence of a broad emission line between 5.8 and 6.4 keV and an edge at 8-9 keV, likely due to reflection of the burst flux from the inner accretion disk in 4U 1820-30. We believe that this is the first time such a signature has been unambiguously detected in the spectrum of an X-ray burst.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/338337

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Strohmayer, T. E., & Brown, E. F.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2002-02-20
Volume
566
Issue
2
Pages
1045-1059
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1996833935
Cited by
249
References
1
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Remarkable 3 Hour Thermonuclear Burst from 4U 1820−30. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/338337
The paper
Strohmayer, T. E., & Brown, E. F. (2002). A Remarkable 3 Hour Thermonuclear Burst from 4U 1820−30. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/338337

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.