The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Costs of Phenotypic Plasticity
Abstract
Phenotypically plastic organisms display alternative phenotypes in different environments. It is widely appreciated that possessing alternative phenotypes can affect fitness. However, some investigators have suggested that simply carrying the ability to be plastic could also affect fitness. Evolutionary models suggest that high costs of plasticity could constrain the evolution of optimal phenotypes. However, costs (and limits) of plasticity are primarily hypothetical. Little empirical evidence exists to show that increased plasticity leads to reduced growth and development, leads to increased developmental instability, or limits the ability of organisms to produce more extreme phenotypes. I used half-sib families of larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) reared in outdoor mesocosms to examine how tadpoles altered behavioral, morphological, and life-historical traits in response to larval dragonfly predators (Anax longipes). The predators induced lower activity and the development of relatively large tails and small bodies in wood frogs. As a result, wood frogs experienced reduced growth and development. I then examined whether tadpole sibships with higher plasticity experienced fitness costs (above and beyond the costs of expressing a particular phenotype) and whether they were limited in producing extreme phenotypes. Fitness effects of plasticity were widespread. Depending on the trait examined and the environment experienced, increased plasticity had either positive effects, negative effects, or no effects on tadpole mass, development, and survivorship. I found no relationship between increased plasticity and greater developmental instability. There was also no evidence that sibships with increased plasticity produced less extreme phenotypes; the most extreme trait states were always produced by the most plastic genotypes. This work suggests that costs of plasticity may be pervasive in nature and may substantially impact the evolution of optimal phenotypes in organisms that live in heterogeneous environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phenotypic Plasticity and the Origins of Diversity
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1989) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001341 · Cited by 2,110
Cited by
Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation
Pigliucci, M., Murren, C. J., & Schlichting, C. D. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.02070 · Cited by 1,122
Physiological Diversity in Insects: Ecological and Evolutionary Contexts
Chown, S. L., & Terblanche, J. S. (2006) · Advances in Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2806(06)33002-0 · Cited by 573
Temperature influences swimming speed, growth and larval duration in coral reef fish larvae
Green, B. S., & Fisher, R. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2003.09.001 · Cited by 294
Trait drift in microalgae and applications for strain improvement
Jebali, A., Sanchez, M. R., Hanschen, E. R., Starkenburg, S. R., & Corcoran, A. A. (2022) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108034 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Relyea, R. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 272-282
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2165918754
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Costs of Phenotypic Plasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/338540
- The paper
- Relyea, R. A. (2002). Costs of Phenotypic Plasticity. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/338540
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.