The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images
Open accessAbstract
We present a two-dimensional fitting algorithm (GALFIT) designed to extract structural components from galaxy images, with emphasis on closely modeling light profiles of spatially well-resolved, nearby galaxies observed with the Hubble Space Telescope . Our algorithm improves on previous techniques in two areas: by being able to simultaneously fit a galaxy with an arbitrary number of components and with optimization in computation speed, suited for working on large galaxy images. We use two-dimensional models such as the "Nuker" law, the Sérsic (de Vaucouleurs) profile, an exponential disk, and Gaussian or Moffat functions. The azimuthal shapes are generalized ellipses that can fit disky and boxy components. Some potential applications of our program include: standard modeling of global galaxy profiles; extracting bars, stellar disks, double nuclei, and compact nuclear sources; and measuring absolute dust extinction or surface brightness fluctuations after removing the galaxy model. When examined in detail, we find that even simple looking galaxies generally require at least three components to be modeled accurately, rather than the one or two components more often employed. Many galaxies with complex isophotes, ellipticity changes, and position angle twists can be modeled accurately in two dimensions. We illustrate this by way of 11 case studies, which include regular and barred spiral galaxies, highly disky lenticular galaxies, and elliptical galaxies displaying various levels of complexities. A useful extension of this algorithm is to accurately extract nuclear point sources in galaxies. We compare two-dimensional and one-dimensional extraction techniques on simulated images of galaxies having nuclear slopes with different degrees of cuspiness, and we then illustrate the application of the program to several examples of nearby galaxies with weak nuclei.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Relationship between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and Their Formation Histories
Conselice, C. J. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/375001 · Cited by 875
Cappellari, M., Scott, N., Alatalo, K., Blitz, L., Bois, M., Bournaud, F., Bureau, M., Crocker, A. F., Davies, R. L., Davis, T. A., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt562 · Cited by 734
Bentz, M. C., Peterson, B. M., Netzer, H., Pogge, R. W., & Vestergaard, M. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/1/160 · Cited by 608
Bezanson, R., van Dokkum, P. G., Tal, T., Marchesini, D., Kriek, M., Franx, M., & Coppi, P. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1290 · Cited by 538
MORPHOLOGIES OF ∼190,000 GALAXIES AT z = 0–10 REVEALED WITH HST LEGACY DATA. I. SIZE EVOLUTION
Shibuya, T., Ouchi, M., & Harikane, Y. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/15 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 266-293
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2079227246
- Cited by
- 2,783
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/340952
- The paper
- Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. (2002). Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/340952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.