The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Expected Redshift Distribution of Gamma‐Ray Bursts
Open accessAbstract
We predict the redshift distribution of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), assuming that they trace the cosmic star formation history. We find that a fraction ≳50% of all GRBs on the sky originate at a redshift z ≳ 5, even though the fraction of the total stellar mass formed by z ~ 5 is only ~15%. These two fractions are significantly different, because they involve different cosmological factors when integrating the star formation rate over redshift. Hence, deep observations of transient events, such as GRB afterglows or supernovae, provide an ideal strategy for probing the high-redshift universe. We caution, however, that existing or planned flux-limited instruments are likely to detect somewhat smaller fractions of high-redshift bursts. For example, we estimate that the fraction of all bursts with redshifts z ≳ 5 is ~10% in the case of the BATSE instrument and ~25% in the case of Swift . We also show that the intrinsic distribution of GRB durations is bimodal but significantly narrower and shifted toward shorter durations than the observed distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions
Lucy, L. B. (1974) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/111605 · Cited by 3,866
Cited by
Bromm, V., & Larson, R. B. (2004) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134034 · Cited by 957
Self-citationThe physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era
Gehrels, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Fox, D. B. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145147 · Cited by 615
The First Cosmic Structures and Their Effects
Ciardi, B., & Ferrara, A. (2005) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-005-3592-0 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Bromm, V., & Loeb, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-08-10
- Volume
- 575
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-116
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2078930426
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Expected Redshift Distribution of Gamma‐Ray Bursts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/341189
- The paper
- Bromm, V., & Loeb, A. (2002). The Expected Redshift Distribution of Gamma‐Ray Bursts. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/341189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.