The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries
Open accessAbstract
The debate on the resurgence of income inequality in some advanced industrial societies has often focused on the impact of an increasingly integrated world economy, typified by growing capital mobility, heightened international competition, and an increase in migration. This study represents one of the first systematic, cross‐national examinations of the role of globalization in the inequality “U-turn.” Results indicate, on the one hand, that total inequality variation is principally affected by the percentage of the labor force in agriculture, followed by the institutional factors union density and decommodification, and only then by globalization. On the other hand, longitudinal variation in inequality, while still dominated by the percentage of the labor force in agriculture, is also principally affected by aspects of globalization, such as southern import penetration and direct investment outflow, and to a lesser extent by migration. In other words, globalization explains the longitudinal trend of increasing inequality that took place within many industrial countries better than it does cross‐sectional inequality differences among countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
LIANG, K.-Y., & ZEGER, S. L. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · Cited by 18,550
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1046 · Cited by 16,528
Filders, R. (1992) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(92)90130-2 · Cited by 16,165
Journal of economic literature
Armstrong, J. S. (1996) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(96)88197-0 · Cited by 9,923
Applied Linear Statistical Models
Ziegel, E. R., Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1992) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269588 · Cited by 9,907
Economic Growth and Income Inequality
Kuznets, S. (2019) · The Gap between Rich and Poor · doi:10.4324/9780429311208-4 · Cited by 8,064
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Hsiao, C. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781009057745 · Cited by 7,869
Applied Linear Statistical Models
(1997) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1997.10485141 · Cited by 7,185
Cited by
Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice
Halaby, C. N. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110629 · Cited by 946
Financialization and U.S. Income Inequality, 1970–2008
Lin, K.-H., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2013) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/669499 · Cited by 573
Good Times, Bad Times: Postwar Labor’s Share of National Income in Capitalist Democracies
Kristal, T. (2010) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122410382640 · Cited by 228
Determinants of labour’s income share in the era of financialisation
Dünhaupt, P. (2017) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bew023 · Cited by 133
Enns, P. K., Kelly, N. J., Morgan, J., Volscho, T., & Witko, C. (2014) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381613001321 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1244-1299
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1491036122
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 91.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/341329
- The paper
- Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (2002). Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/341329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.