The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flows, Fragmentation, and Star Formation. I. Low‐Mass Stars in Taurus
Open accessAbstract
The remarkably filamentary spatial distribution of young stars in the Taurus molecular cloud has significant implications for understanding low-mass star formation in relatively quiescent conditions. The large scale and regular spacing of the filaments suggests that small-scale turbulence is of limited importance, which could be consistent with the driving on large scales by flows that produced the cloud. The small spatial dispersion of stars from gaseous filaments indicates that the low-mass stars are generally born with small velocity dispersions relative to their natal gas, of the order of the sound speed or less. The spatial distribution of the stars exhibits a mean separation of about 0.25 pc, comparable to the estimated Jeans length in the densest gaseous filaments, and is consistent with roughly uniform density along the filaments. The efficiency of star formation in filaments is much higher than elsewhere, with an associated higher frequency of protostars and accreting T Tauri stars. The protostellar cores are generally aligned with the filaments, suggesting that they are produced by gravitational fragmentation, resulting in initially quasi-prolate cores. Given the absence of massive stars that could strongly dominate cloud dynamics, Taurus provides important tests of theories of dispersed low-mass star formation and numerical simulations of molecular cloud structure and evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence
Mac Low, M.-M., & Klessen, R. S. (2004) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.125 · Cited by 1,761
Star formation and feedback in smoothed particle hydrodynamic simulations – I. Isolated galaxies
Stinson, G., Seth, A., Katz, N., Wadsley, J., Governato, F., & Quinn, T. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11097.x · Cited by 746
Könyves, V., André, P., Men’shchikov, A., Palmeirim, P., Arzoumanian, D., Schneider, N., Roy, A., Didelon, P., Maury, A., Shimajiri, Y., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525861 · Cited by 486
Cores, filaments, and bundles: hierarchical core formation in the L1495/B213 Taurus region
Hacar, A., Tafalla, M., Kauffmann, J., & Kovács, A. (2013) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220090 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartmann, L.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-10-20
- Volume
- 578
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 914-924
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1999003968
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flows, Fragmentation, and Star Formation. I. Low‐Mass Stars in Taurus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/342657
- The paper
- Hartmann, L. (2002). Flows, Fragmentation, and Star Formation. I. Low‐Mass Stars in Taurus. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/342657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.