The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Magnetic Fields and Particle Acceleration in Cassiopeia A
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the nonthermal X-ray emission from Cas A, using BeppoSAX , Compton Gamma Ray Observatory OSSE, and Chandra data. For the hard X-ray continuum we test the model proposed by Laming, which invokes nonthermal bremsstrahlung from electrons accelerated by lower hybrid plasma waves. The justification for this model comes from our determination of a lower limit to the average magnetic field of B > 0.5 mG. For such high magnetic fields, the synchrotron losses are severe enough that most of the electron populations responsible for the radio emission have maximum electron energies well below the limit for which X-ray synchrotron emission is important. However, we do suggest that the rim surrounding Cas A, seen in Chandra continuum images, is X-ray synchrotron emission. The width of this rim of 1 5-4'' can be used to infer the magnetic field near the shock front, for which we estimate B = 0.08-0.16 mG and electron energies of ~57-40 TeV. This magnetic field strength is lower than the average magnetic field but higher than what may be expected from shocked interstellar medium, suggesting either a high magnetic field in the wind of the progenitor or rapid postshock field amplification by nonlinear growth of plasma waves. Combining the two magnetic field measurements, we have constructed a simple two-zone model. Most of the radio emission comes from inside Cas A, where the magnetic field is strong. In contrast, the inverse Compton emission is dominated by emission from near the shock front. Only for our lower limit on the magnetic field strength near the shock front is it possible to explain the recent detection of TeV emission by the High Energy Gamma Ray Astronomy experiment with inverse Compton emission, for which, in addition, we have to assume a rather high far-infrared photon density that should be twice as high as our best estimate of ~70 cm -3 . Pion decay is therefore likely to be the dominant emission from Cas A at TeV energies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Probable Flamsteed Observation of the Cassiopeia a Supernova
Ashworth, W. B. (1980) · Journal for the History of Astronomy · doi:10.1177/002182868001100102 · Cited by 129 · cited 1×
“The two year lifetime is much shorter than the lifetime of Cas A, which is probably the 1 Chandra fellow 1 2 J. Vink & J. M. Laming remnant of a supernova that exploded in AD 1680 (Ashworth 1980).”
Background
Cited by
Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A. G., Bazer-Bachi, A. R., Beilicke, M., Benbow, W., Berge, D., Bernlöhr, K., Boisson, C., Bolz, O., Borrel, V., et al. (2006) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054279 · Cited by 309
Gabici, S., Aharonian, F. A., & Casanova, S. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14832.x · Cited by 294
Radio signature of cosmological structure formation shocks
Hoeft, M., & Bruggen, M. (2007) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11111.x · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Vink, J., & Laming, J. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-02-20
- Volume
- 584
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 758-769
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1964293522
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Magnetic Fields and Particle Acceleration in Cassiopeia A. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/345832
- The paper
- Vink, J., & Laming, J. M. (2003). On the Magnetic Fields and Particle Acceleration in Cassiopeia A. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/345832
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.