The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Globally Consistent Richness‐Climate Relationship for Angiosperms
Abstract
Species richness, the simplest index of biodiversity, varies greatly over broad spatial scales. Richness-climate relationships often account for >80% of the spatial variance in richness. However, it has been suggested that richness-climate relationships differ significantly among geographic regions and that there is no globally consistent relationship. This study investigated the global patterns of species and family richness of angiosperms in relation to climate. We found that models relating angiosperm richness to mean annual temperature, annual water deficit, and their interaction or models relating richness to annual potential evapotranspiration and water deficit are both globally consistent and very strong and are independent of the diverse evolutionary histories and functional assemblages of plants in different parts of the world. Thus, effects of other factors such as evolutionary history, postglacial dispersal, soil nutrients, topography, or other climatic variables either must be quite minor over broad scales (because there is little residual variation left to explain) or they must be strongly collinear with global patterns of climate. The correlations shown here must be predicted by any successful hypothesis of mechanisms controlling richness patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Species diversity in space and time
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2720 · Cited by 4,573
Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals?
Hutchinson, G. E. (1959) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282070 · Cited by 4,138
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species
Brown, J. H. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284267 · Cited by 3,276
Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-0294 · Cited by 1,778
Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness
Currie, D. J. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285144 · Cited by 1,753
Self-citationWHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY?
Mittelbach, G. G., Steiner, C. F., Scheiner, S. M., Gross, K. L., Reynolds, H. L., Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Dodson, S. I., & Gough, L. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2381:witorb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,650
Latitudinal Gradients in Species Diversity: The Search for the Primary Cause
Rohde, K. (1992) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545569 · Cited by 1,623
Species-Energy Theory: An Extension of Species-Area Theory
Wright, D. H. (1983) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544109 · Cited by 1,480
Cited by
Niche Conservatism: Integrating Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation Biology
Wiens, J. J., & Graham, C. H. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431 · Cited by 2,615
A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity
Ricklefs, R. E. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00554.x · Cited by 1,360
Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness
Currie, D. J., Mittelbach, G. G., Cornell, H. V., Field, R., Guégan, J., Hawkins, B. A., Kaufman, D. M., Kerr, J. T., Oberdorff, T., O'Brien, E., et al. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00671.x · Cited by 1,296
Self-citationSpecies richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation
Hurlbert, A. H., & Jetz, W. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704469104 · Cited by 710
Fire as a key driver of Earth's biodiversity
He, T., Lamont, B. B., & Pausas, J. G. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12544 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Francis, A. P., & Currie, D. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 523-536
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2109987992
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 26.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Globally Consistent Richness‐Climate Relationship for Angiosperms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/368223
- The paper
- Francis, A. P., & Currie, D. J. (2003). A Globally Consistent Richness‐Climate Relationship for Angiosperms. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/368223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.