New Inscriptions of Nabuna’id
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A text of Nabonidus similar to the Sippar Cylinder, also addressing the Ebarra temple of Shamash reconstruction and dedication, counts from the 10th year of his reign and notes that 52 years had elapsed from the actions of Nebuchadnezzar II in addition to recording 700 years between the temple construction by Hammurabi and the time of Burnaburiash.
“A text of Nabonidus similar to the Sippar Cylinder, also addressing the Ebarra temple of Shamash reconstruction and dedication, differs in that it counts from the 10th year of his reign and notes that 52 years had elapsed from the actions of Nebuchadnezzar II in addition to recording 700 years between the temple construction by Hammurabi and the time of Burnaburiash”
From Temple Dedication and Construction Texts of the Ancient Near East with Elapsed Years: Implications for Long Duration Chronologies (2024) · cites this paper as Langdon 1916, pp. 110-16
A text of Nabonidus similar to the Sippar Cylinder, addressing the Ebarra temple of Shamash, counts from the 10th year of his reign, notes 52 years elapsed from Nebuchadnezzar II's actions, and records 700 years between Hammurabi's temple construction and the time of Burnaburiash.
“A text of Nabonidus similar to the Sippar Cylinder, also addressing the Ebarra temple of Shamash reconstruction and dedication, differs in that it counts from the 10th year of his reign and notes that 52 years had elapsed from the actions of Nebuchadnezzar II in addition to recording 700 years between the temple construction by Hammurabi and the time of Burnaburiash”
From Temple Dedication and Construction Texts of the Ancient Near East with Elapsed Years: Implications for Long Duration Chronologies (2024) · cites this paper as Langdon 1916
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Langdon, S.
- Corresponding author
- Langdon, S.
- ORCID
- Langdon, S.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1916-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-117
- ISSN
- 1062-0516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053303825
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Keywords
- inscriptions, Ugaritic texts, Ugarit, Ugaritic language, Ugaritic epigraphy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
