The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Galactic Disk Mass Function: Reconciliation of the [ITAL]Hubble Space Telescope[/ITAL] and Nearby Determinations
Open accessAbstract
We derive and parameterize the Galactic mass function (MF) below 1 M ☉ characteristic of both single objects and binary systems. We resolve the long-standing discrepancy between the MFs derived from the Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) and from the nearby luminosity functions, respectively. We show that this discrepancy stemmed from two cumulative effects, namely, (1) incorrect color-magnitude-determined distances, due to a substantial fraction of M dwarfs in the HST sample belonging to the metal-depleted thick-disk population, as corrected recently by Zheng et al., and (2) unresolved binaries. We show that both the nearby and HST MF for unresolved systems are consistent with a fraction ~50% of M dwarf binaries, with the mass of both the primaries and the companions originating from the same underlying single MF. This implies that ~30% of M dwarfs should have an M dwarf companion and ~20% should have a brown dwarf companion, in agreement with recent determinations. The present calculations show that the so-called "brown dwarf desert" should be reinterpreted as a lack of high mass ratio ( m 2 / m 1 ≲ 0.1) systems and does not preclude a substantial fraction of brown dwarfs as companions of M dwarfs or for other brown dwarfs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x · Cited by 10,500
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
Self-citationThe Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release
Scolnic, D., Brout, D., Carr, A., Riess, A. G., Davis, T. M., Dwomoh, A., Jones, D. O., Ali, N., Charvu, P., Chen, R., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a · Cited by 939
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Pérez‐González, P. G., Rieke, G. H., Villar, V., Barro, G., Blaylock, M., Egami, E., Gallego, J., Gil de Paz, A., Pascual, S., Zamorano, J., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/523690 · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Chabrier, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 586
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- L133-L136
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1970660289
- Cited by
- 860
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Galactic Disk Mass Function: Reconciliation of the [ITAL]Hubble Space Telescope[/ITAL] and Nearby Determinations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/374879
- The paper
- Chabrier, G. (2003). The Galactic Disk Mass Function: Reconciliation of the [ITAL]Hubble Space Telescope[/ITAL] and Nearby Determinations. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/374879
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.