The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Temperature‐Size Rule in Ectotherms: Simple Evolutionary Explanations May Not Be General
Abstract
In many organisms, individuals in colder environments grow more slowly but are larger as adults. This widespread pattern is embodied by two well-established rules: Bergmann's rule, which describes the association between temperature and body size in natural environments, and the temperature-size rule, which describes reaction norms relating temperature to body size in laboratory experiments. Theory predicts that organisms should grow to be larger in colder environments when growth efficiency decreases with increasing environmental temperature. Using data from 97 laboratory experiments, including 58 species of ectotherms, we found little evidence that growth efficiency is negatively related to environmental temperature within the thermal range that is relevant to the temperature-size rule. Instead, growth efficiency was either positively related or insensitive to environmental temperature in the majority of cases (73 of 89 cases for gross growth efficiency and 18 of 24 cases for net growth efficiency). Two possibilities merit consideration. First, high temperatures may impose constraints on growth that only arise late during ontogeny; this simple and potentially general explanation is supported by the fact that thermal optima for growth efficiency and growth rate decrease as individuals grow. Alternatively, the general explanation for relationships between temperature and body size may not be simple. If the latter view is correct, the best approach might be to generate and test theories that are tailored specifically to organisms with similar behavior and physiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koskela, J., Pirhonen, J., & Jobling, M. (1997) · Aquaculture International · doi:10.1023/a:1018316224253 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective
Chown, S. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2009.00097.x · Cited by 772
Impact of Extreme Temperatures on Parasitoids in a Climate Change Perspective
Hance, T., van Baaren, J., Vernon, P., & Boivin, G. (2007) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091333 · Cited by 709
Climate warming and ectotherm body size – from individual physiology to community ecology
Ohlberger, J. (2013) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12098 · Cited by 406
Mesocosm Experiments as a Tool for Ecological Climate-Change Research
Stewart, R. I. A., Dossena, M., Bohan, D. A., Jeppesen, E., Kordas, R. L., Ledger, M. E., Meerhoff, M., Moss, B., Mulder, C., Shurin, J. B., et al. (2013) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417199-2.00002-1 · Cited by 387
Verberk, W. C. E. P., Atkinson, D., Hoefnagel, K. N., Hirst, A. G., Horne, C. R., & Siepel, H. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12653 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Angilletta, Jr., & Dunham, A. E.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 332-342
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2145417185
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Temperature‐Size Rule in Ectotherms: Simple Evolutionary Explanations May Not Be General. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/377187
- The paper
- Angilletta, Jr., & Dunham, A. E. (2003). The Temperature‐Size Rule in Ectotherms: Simple Evolutionary Explanations May Not Be General. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/377187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.