First‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Foreground Emission
Open accessAbstract
The WMAP mission has mapped the full sky to determine the geometry, content, and evolution of the universe. Full-sky maps are made in five microwave frequency bands to separate the temperature anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from foreground emission, including diffuse Galactic emission and Galactic and extragalactic point sources. We define masks that excise regions of high foreground emission, so CMB analyses can be carried out with minimal foreground contamination. We also present maps and spectra of the individual emission components, leading to an improved understanding of Galactic astrophysical processes. The effectiveness of template fits to remove foreground emission from the WMAP data is also examined. These efforts result in a CMB map with minimal contamination and a demonstration that the WMAP CMB power spectrum is insensitive to residual foreground emission. We use a maximum entropy method to construct a model of the Galactic emission components. The observed total Galactic emission matches the model to less than 1%, and the individual model components are accurate to a few percent. We find that the Milky Way resembles other normal spiral galaxies between 408 MHz and 23 GHz, with a synchrotron spectral index that is flattest (β s ∼ -2.5) near star-forming regions, especially in the plane, and steepest (β s ∼ -3) in the halo. This is consistent with a picture of relativistic cosmic-ray electron generation in star-forming regions and diffusion and convection within the plane. The significant synchrotron index steepening out of the plane suggests a diffusion process in which the halo electrons are trapped in the Galactic potential long enough to suffer synchrotron and inverse Compton energy losses and hence a spectral steepening. The synchrotron index is steeper in the WMAP bands than in lower frequency radio surveys, with a spectral break near 20 GHz to β s < -3. The modeled thermal dust spectral index is also steep in the WMAP bands, with β d ≈ 2.2. Our model is driven to these conclusions by the low level of total foreground contamination at ∼60 GHz. Microwave and Hα measurements of the ionized gas agree well with one another at about the expected levels. Spinning dust emission is limited to ≲5% of the Ka-band foreground emission, assuming a thermal dust distribution with a cold neutral medium spectrum and a monotonically decreasing synchrotron spectrum. A catalog of 208 point sources is presented. The reliability of the catalog is 98%; i.e., we expect five of the 208 sources to be statistically spurious. The mean spectral index of the point sources is α ∼ 0 (β ∼ -2). Derived source counts suggest a contribution to the anisotropy power from unresolved sources of (15.0 ± 1.4) × 10 -3 μK 2 sr at Q band and negligible levels at V band and W band. The Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect is shown to be a negligible "contamination" to the maps.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The primordial universe was, to high precision, a spatial Gaussian random field.
“The primordial universe was, to high precision, a spatial Gaussian random field, which has been shown observationally by numerous cosmic microwave background experiments such as COBE (Bennett et al. 2003), WMAP (Spergel et al. 2007), and more recently Planck (Abergel et al. 2011).”
From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Bennett et al. 2003
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 72 · Cited by 991
- Authors
- Bennett, C. L., Hill, R. S., Hinshaw, G., Nolta, M. R., Odegard, N., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Weiland, J. L., Wright, E. L., Halpern, M., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Tucker, G. S., & Wollack, E.
- Affiliations
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- Science Systems and Applications (United States) (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-117
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2023573336
- Cited by
- 991
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 58.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- NASA Headquarters
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- cosmic microwave background, foreground emission, Galactic diffuse emission, synchrotron radiation, thermal dust emission, spinning dust, point source catalog, CMB power spectrum, foreground masking, maximum entropy model, synchrotron spectral index, cosmic ray electrons, Milky Way, inverse Compton scattering, H-alpha emission, template fitting, star-forming regions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review