The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Summary and Conclusions: Measles Elimination Meeting, 16–17 March 2000
Abstract
On 16-17 March 2000, the National Immunization Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened 12 consultants and 10 resource specialists to review the present status of measles in the United States and to provide individual opinions on 4 questions: Is measles currently endemic in the United States? If current information is not sufficient to make such a determination, what additional information is needed? Is it possible or desirable to establish a precise definition of What elements of the US immunization program should be modified or strengthened to achieve/maintain elimination? The consultants and resource specialists are listed after the text. The meeting included a series of presentations, contained in this supplement issue of The Journal of Infectious Diseases, followed by open discussion among the consultants and delivery of their opinions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Statistical physics of vaccination
Wang, Z., Bauch, C. T., Bhattacharyya, S., d'Onofrio, A., Manfredi, P., Perc, M., Perra, N., Salathé, M., & Zhao, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.006 · Cited by 872
The effect of opinion clustering on disease outbreaks
Salathé, M., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0271 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- S43-S47
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2172051652
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Summary and Conclusions: Measles Elimination Meeting, 16–17 March 2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/377696
- The paper
- Summary and Conclusions: Measles Elimination Meeting, 16–17 March 2000. (2004). The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/377696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
