The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Mechanistic Understanding and Prediction of Biotic Homogenization
Abstract
The widespread replacement of native species with cosmopolitan, nonnative species is homogenizing the global fauna and flora. While the empirical study of biotic homogenization is substantial and growing, theoretical aspects have yet to be explored. Consequently, the breadth of possible ecological mechanisms that can shape current and future patterns and rates of homogenization remain largely unknown. Here, we develop a conceptual model that describes 14 potential scenarios by which species invasions and/or extinctions can lead to various trajectories of biotic homogenization (increased community similarity) or differentiation (decreased community similarity); we then use a simulation approach to explore the model's predictions. We found changes in community similarity to vary with the type and number of nonnative and native species, the historical degree of similarity among the communities, and, to a lesser degree, the richness of the recipient communities. Homogenization is greatest when similar species invade communities, causing either no extinction or differential extinction of native species. The model predictions are consistent with current empirical data for fish, bird, and plant communities and therefore may represent the dominant mechanisms of contemporary homogenization. We present a unifying model illustrating how the balance between invading and extinct species dictates the outcome of biotic homogenization. We conclude by discussing a number of critical but largely unrecognized issues that bear on the empirical study of biotic homogenization, including the importance of spatial scale, temporal scale, and data resolution. We argue that the study of biotic homogenization needs to be placed in a more mechanistic and predictive framework in order for studies to provide adequate guidance in conservation efforts to maintain regional distinctness of the global biota.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494 · Cited by 9,086
BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Mark Lonsdale, W., Evans, H., Clout, M., & Bazzaz, F. A. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:bicegc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,156
Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review
SAUNDERS, D. A., HOBBS, R. J., & MARGULES, C. R. (1991) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x · Cited by 4,110
The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants.
Richards, P. W., & Elton, C. S. (1959) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2257385 · Cited by 3,905
Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction
McKinney, M. L., & Lockwood, J. L. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01679-1 · Cited by 2,707
Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction
Brown, J. H., & Kodric-Brown, A. (1977) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1935620 · Cited by 2,621
The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants
Elton, C. C. (1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5851-7 · Cited by 2,465
(1996) · American Scientist · Cited by 2,038
GLOBAL PATTERNS OF PLANT INVASIONS AND THE CONCEPT OF INVASIBILITY
Lonsdale, W. M. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1522:gpopia]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,000
Ecological Roulette: The Global Transport of Nonindigenous Marine Organisms
Cariton, J. T., & Geller, J. B. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.261.5117.78 · Cited by 1,624
Cited by
Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization?
Clavel, J., Julliard, R., & Devictor, V. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/080216 · Cited by 1,600
Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization
Olden, J. D., LeRoy Poff, N., Douglas, M. R., Douglas, M. E., & Fausch, K. D. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.010 · Cited by 1,573
Self-citationPyšek, P., Jarošík, V., Hulme, P. E., Pergl, J., Hejda, M., Schaffner, U., & Vilà, M. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x · Cited by 1,447
Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health
Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548 · Cited by 1,406
On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization
Olden, J. D., & Rooney, T. P. (2006) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-822x.2006.00214.x · Cited by 801
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Olden, J. D., & Poff, N. L.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 442-460
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2073100799
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Mechanistic Understanding and Prediction of Biotic Homogenization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/378212
- The paper
- Olden, J. D., & Poff, N. L. (2003). Toward a Mechanistic Understanding and Prediction of Biotic Homogenization. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/378212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.