The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interacting Guilds: Moving beyond the Pairwise Perspective on Mutualisms
Abstract
Most textbook treatments imply, and almost all theoretical analyses assume, that mutualistic interactions take place between a single pair of interacting partner species. A major goal of this symposium is to broaden and shift this pairwise perspective and make it concordant with the emerging view that locally exclusive mutualisms between just two species are the exception and that many communities include guilds of mutualistic species on one or both sides of the interaction. Many pollination and seed-dispersal mutualisms have long been recognized as diffuse, but recent molecular analyses are revealing unrecognized partner diversity in mutualistic interactions previously thought to be locally species specific. Co-occurring species within a mutualist guild are unlikely to be ecologically equivalent in the way they locate, compete for, and/or reward partners, and so intraguild interactions have the potential to influence population dynamics and patterns of selection in species on both sides of the mutualistic interaction. To illustrate some of these potential complexities for population dynamics, I use simple path analytic models to show that positive pairwise interactions between mutualists do not necessarily translate into positive net interactions within a mutualism involving more than two species. For example, when there is intraguild competition for partners, or even for resources external to the mutualism, the presence of a lower-quality mutualist can negatively affect the partner population by reducing associations it can form with better mutualists. Variation in quality among potential partners is likely to place a premium on traits or behaviors that enhance association with better mutualists. More investigations are needed to determine how variation among interacting mutualists, with respect to characteristics such as longevity, dispersal capability, and competitive ability, influence population dynamics and selection in multispecies mutualisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AND MACROEVOLUTION: EXTENSIONS AND MISMATCHES ACROSS SCALES AND LEVELS
Jablonski, D. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00317.x · Cited by 294
Suitability of (extra-)floral nectar, pollen, and honeydew as insect food sources
Wäckers, F. L. (2005) · Plant-Provided Food for Carnivorous Insects · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511542220.003 · Cited by 290
Coevolutionary Constraints? The Environment Alters Tripartite Interaction Traits in a Legume
Heath, K. D., & McGhee, K. E. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041567 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanton, M. L.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- S4
- Pages
- S10-S23
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2022613595
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interacting Guilds: Moving beyond the Pairwise Perspective on Mutualisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/378646
- The paper
- Stanton, M. L. (2003). Interacting Guilds: Moving beyond the Pairwise Perspective on Mutualisms. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/378646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.