The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities
Abstract
We present a model of a source-sink competitive metacommunity, defined as a regional set of communities in which local diversity is maintained by dispersal. Although the conditions of local and regional coexistence have been well defined in such systems, no study has attempted to provide clear predictions of classical community-wide patterns. Here we provide predictions for species richness, species relative abundances, and community-level functional properties (productivity and space occupation) at the local and regional scales as functions of the proportion of dispersal between communities. Local (alpha) diversity is maximal at an intermediate level of dispersal, whereas between-community (beta) and regional (gamma) diversity decline as dispersal increases because of increased homogenization of the metacommunity. The relationships between local and regional species richness and the species rank abundance distributions are strongly affected by the level of dispersal. Local productivity and space occupation tend to decline as dispersal increases, resulting in either a hump-shaped or a positive relationship between species richness and productivity, depending on the scale considered (local or regional). These effects of dispersal are buffered by decreasing species dispersal success. Our results provide a niche-based alternative to the recent neutral-metacommunity model and have important implications for conservation biology and landscape management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective
(2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.001.0001 · Cited by 608
Self-citationBiodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research
Hillebrand, H., & Matthiessen, B. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01388.x · Cited by 591
Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community
Ofiţeru, I. D., Lunn, M., Curtis, T. P., Wells, G. F., Criddle, C. S., Francis, C. A., & Sloan, W. T. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000604107 · Cited by 580
Heino, J., Alahuhta, J., Bini, L. M., Cai, Y., Heiskanen, A., Hellsten, S., Kortelainen, P., Kotamäki, N., Tolonen, K. T., Vihervaara, P., et al. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12647 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 544-557
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2113060311
- Cited by
- 1,082
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/378857
- The paper
- Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M. (2003). Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/378857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.