Hospital transmission of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among postpartum women.
Abstract
Infections caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) are being increasingly observed in patients who lack traditional risk factors. We described 8 postpartum women who developed skin and soft-tissue infections caused by MRSA at a mean time of 23 days (range, 4-73 days) after delivery. Infections included 4 cases of mastitis (3 of which progressed to breast abscess), a postoperative wound infection, cellulitis, and pustulosis. The outbreak strains were compared with the prototype CA-MRSA strain MW2 and found to be indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. All were spa type 131, all contained the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec type IV, and all expressed Panton-Valentine leukocidin and staphylococcal enterotoxins C and H. The route of transmission was not discovered: the results of surveillance cultures of samples obtained from employees of the hospital, the hospital environment, and newborns were negative for the outbreak strain. We report that MW2, which was previously limited to the midwestern United States, has spread to the northeastern United States and has become a health care-associated pathogen.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reports of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus postpartum mastitis among young, healthy women lacking traditional risk factors for MRSA have emerged in the past few years.
“Reports of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) PPM among young, healthy women lacking traditional risk factors for MRSA have emerged in the past few years (6,7).”
From Postpartum Mastitis and Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (2007) · cites this paper as [6]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 45 · Cited by 372
- Authors
- Saiman, L., Keefe, M. O., Graham, P. L., Wu, F., Salim, B. S., Kreiswirth, B., LaSala, A., Schlievert, P. M., & Latta, P. D.
- Affiliations
- NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Saiman, L.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-11-15
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1313-1319
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2159311443
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 20.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL36611)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
- Keywords
- community-acquired MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, postpartum women, nosocomial transmission, outbreak, skin and soft tissue infections, mastitis, breast abscess, cellulitis, pustulosis, surgical site infection, SCCmec type IV, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, staphylococcal enterotoxins, nosocomial infections
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cross Infection, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Risk Factors, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Case-Control Studies, Methicillin Resistance, Community-Acquired Infections, Virulence Factors, Postpartum Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review