The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Models for Type I X‐Ray Bursts with Improved Nuclear Physics
Open accessAbstract
Multi-zone models of Type I X-ray bursts are presented that use an adaptive nuclear reaction network of unprecedented size, up to 1300 isotopes. Sequences of up to 15 bursts are followed for two choices of accretion rate and metallicity. At 0.1 Eddington (and 0.02 Eddington for low metallicity), combined hydrogen-helium flashes occur. The rise times, shapes, and tails of these light curves are sensitive to the efficiency of nuclear burning at various waiting points along the rp-process path and these sensitivities are explored. The bursts show "compositional inertia", in that their properties depend on the fact that accretion occurs onto the ashes of previous bursts which contain left-over hydrogen, helium and CNO nuclei. This acts to reduce the sensitivity of burst properties to metallicity. For the accretion rates studied, only the first anomalous burst in one model produces nuclei as heavy as A=100, other bursts make chiefly nuclei with A~64. The amount of carbon remaining after hydrogen-helium bursts is typically <1% by mass, and decreases further as the ashes are periodically heated by subsequent bursts. At the lower accretion rate of 0.02 Eddington and solar metallicity, the bursts ignite in a hydrogen-free helium layer. At the base of this layer, up to 90% of the helium has already burned to carbon prior to the unstable ignition. These helium-ignited bursts have briefer, brighter light curves with shorter tails, very rapid rise times (<0.1 s), and ashes lighter than the iron group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,360
MODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA): BINARIES, PULSATIONS, AND EXPLOSIONS
Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., Bildsten, L., Cantiello, M., Dessart, L., Farmer, R., Hu, H., Langer, N., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 · Cited by 3,204
Evolution of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Herwig, F. (2005) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150600 · Cited by 1,051
Thermonuclear (Type I) X‐Ray Bursts Observed by the Rossi X‐Ray Timing Explorer
Galloway, D. K., Muno, M. P., Hartman, J. M., Psaltis, D., & Chakrabarty, D. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/592044 · Cited by 745
THE REMARKABLE DEATHS OF 9–11 SOLAR MASS STARS
Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/1/34 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., Cumming, A., Hoffman, R. D., Pruet, J., Rauscher, T., Fisker, J. L., Schatz, H., Brown, B. A., & Wiescher, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-102
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2041835596
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Models for Type I X‐Ray Bursts with Improved Nuclear Physics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/381533
- The paper
- Woosley, S. E., Heger, A., Cumming, A., Hoffman, R. D., Pruet, J., Rauscher, T., Fisker, J. L., Schatz, H., Brown, B. A., & Wiescher, M. (2004). Models for Type I X‐Ray Bursts with Improved Nuclear Physics. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/381533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.