Cited by 25Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

12C/13C Ratio in Planetary Nebulae from the IUE Archives

Open access
Rubin, R. H., Ferland, G. J., Chollet, E. E., Horstmeyer, R.·2004·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We investigated the abundance ratio of 12 C/ 13 C in planetary nebulae by examining emission lines arising from C III 2 s 2 p 3 P → 2 s 2 1 S 0 . Spectra were retrieved from the International Ultraviolet Explorer archives, and multiple spectra of the same object were co-added to achieve improved signal-to-noise ratio. The 13 C hyperfine structure line at 1909.6 Å was detected in NGC 2440. The 12 C/ 13 C ratio was found to be ~4.4 ± 1.2. In all other objects, we provide an upper limit for the flux of the 1910 Å line. For 23 of these sources, a lower limit for the 12 C/ 13 C ratio was established. The impact on our current understanding of stellar evolution is discussed. The resulting high-signal-to-noise ratio C III spectrum helps constrain the atomic physics of the line formation process. Some objects have the measured 1907/1909 Å flux ratio outside the low-electron density theoretical limit for 12 C. A mixture of 13 C with 12 C helps to close the gap somewhat. Nevertheless, some observed 1907/1909 Å flux ratios still appear too high to conform to the currently predicted limits. It is shown that this limit, as well as the 1910/1909 Å flux ratio, are predominantly influenced by using the standard partitioning among the collision strengths for the multiplet 1 S 0 - 3 P according to the statistical weights. A detailed calculation for the fine-structure collision strengths between these individual levels would be valuable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/382528

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubin, R. H., Ferland, G. J., Chollet, E. E., & Horstmeyer, R.
Affiliations
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2004-04-20
Volume
605
Issue
2
Pages
784-792
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2016525928
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Ames Research Center
  • Astrophysics Division
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
13C/12C ratio, planetary nebulae, C III emission lines, hyperfine structure, NGC 2440, carbon isotope fractionation, statistical weights, stellar evolution, ultraviolet spectra

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review