The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model‐independent Constraints on Dark Energy Density from Flux‐averaging Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Data
Open accessAbstract
We reconstruct the dark energy density ρ X ( z ) as a free function from current Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) data, together with the cosmic microwave background (CMB) shift parameter from CMB data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ), Cosmic Background Imager (CBI), and Arcminute Cosmology Bolometer Array Receiver (ACBAR), and the large-scale structure (LSS) growth factor from the Two-Degree Field (2dF) galaxy survey data. We parameterize ρ X ( z ) as a continuous function, given by interpolating its amplitudes at equally spaced z -values in the redshift range covered by SN Ia data, and a constant at larger z [where ρ X ( z ) is only weakly constrained by CMB data]. We assume a flat universe and use the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique in our analysis. We find that the dark energy density ρ X ( z ) is constant for 0 ≲ z ≲ 0.5 and increases with redshift z for 0.5 ≲ z ≲ 1 at a 68.3% confidence level, but is consistent with a constant at a 95% confidence level. For comparison, we also give constraints on a constant equation of state for the dark energy. Flux averaging of SN Ia data is required to yield cosmological parameter constraints that are free of the bias induced by weak gravitational lensing. We set up a consistent framework for flux-averaging analysis of SN Ia data, based on the work of Wang. We find that flux averaging of SN Ia data leads to slightly lower Ω m and smaller time variation in ρ X ( z ). This suggests that a significant increase in the number of SNe Ia from deep SN surveys on a dedicated telescope is needed to place a robust constraint on the time dependence of the dark energy density.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Tucker, G. S., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377253 · Cited by 4,860
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
The absolute magnitudes of Type IA supernovae
Phillips, M. M. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/186970 · Cited by 2,111
Cited by
Bamba, K., Capozziello, S., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2012) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1181-8 · Cited by 2,387
Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and supernova
Feng, B., Wang, X., & Zhang, X. (2005) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.071 · Cited by 1,307
Extended theories of gravity and their cosmological and astrophysical applications
Capozziello, S., & Francaviglia, M. (2008) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0551-y · Cited by 874
Quintom cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations
Cai, Y.-F., Saridakis, E. N., Setare, M. R., & Xia, J.-Q. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001 · Cited by 868
SAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2006) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271806009704 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., & Mukherjee, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-05-10
- Volume
- 606
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 654-663
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2017415340
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model‐independent Constraints on Dark Energy Density from Flux‐averaging Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/383196
- The paper
- Wang, Y., & Mukherjee, P. (2004). Model‐independent Constraints on Dark Energy Density from Flux‐averaging Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Data. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/383196
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.