Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 851

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Gemini–North Multi‐Object Spectrograph: Performance in Imaging, Long‐Slit, and Multi‐Object Spectroscopic Modes

Open access
Hook, I. M., Jørgensen, Inger, Allington‐Smith, J. R., Davies, R. L., Metcalfe, N., Murowinski, R. G., Crampton, D.·2004·Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

Abstract

Results of the commissioning of the first Gemini Multi‐Object Spectrograph (GMOS) are described. GMOS and the Gemini–North telescope act as a complete system to exploit a large 8 m aperture with improved image quality. Key GMOS design features such as the on‐instrument wave‐front sensor (OIWFS) and active flexure compensation system maintain very high image quality and stability, allowing precision observations of many targets simultaneously while reducing the need for frequent recalibration and reacquisition of targets. In this paper, example observations in imaging, long‐slit, and multiobject spectroscopic modes are presented and verified by comparison with data from the literature. The expected high throughput of GMOS is confirmed from standard star observations; it peaks at about 60% when imaging in the r ' and i ' bands, and at 45%–50% in spectroscopic mode at 6300 Å. Deep GMOS photometry in the g ' , r ' , and i ' filters is compared to data from the literature, and the uniformity of this photometry across the GMOS field is verified. The multiobject spectroscopic mode is demonstrated by observations of the galaxy cluster A383. Centering of objects in the multislit mask was achieved to an rms accuracy of 80 mas across the 5 5 field, and an optimized setup procedure (now in regular use) improves this to better than 50 mas. Stability during these observations was high, as expected: the average shift between object and slit positions was 5.3 mas hr −1 , and the wavelength scale drifted by only 0.1 Å hr −1 (in a setup with spectral resolution of 6 Å). Finally, the current status of GMOS on Gemini–North is summarized, and future plans are outlined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/383624

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 851

Metadata

Authors
Hook, I. M., Jørgensen, I., Allington‐Smith, J. R., Davies, R. L., Metcalfe, N., Murowinski, R. G., & Crampton, D.
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Published
2004-05
Volume
116
Issue
819
Pages
425-440
ISSN
  • 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3873
OpenAlex
W2027686843
Cited by
851
References
1
FWCI
18.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Gemini–North Multi‐Object Spectrograph: Performance in Imaging, Long‐Slit, and Multi‐Object Spectroscopic Modes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/383624
The paper
Hook, I. M., Jørgensen, I., Allington‐Smith, J. R., Davies, R. L., Metcalfe, N., Murowinski, R. G., & Crampton, D. (2004). The Gemini–North Multi‐Object Spectrograph: Performance in Imaging, Long‐Slit, and Multi‐Object Spectroscopic Modes. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/383624

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.