Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Some Aspects of the Embryology of Behavior

Hamburger, Viktor·1963·The Quarterly Review of Biology

Abstract

In the past, the development of behavior in vertebrate embryos has been interpreted in terms of two opposing viewpoints. Coghill, on the basis of his observations on the salamander Ambystoma, has maintained that behavior represents an integrated pattern from beginning to end; partial patterns segregate from total patterns by a developmental process which he calls "individuation." The opposing view, advocated by Windle and other students of the behavior of mammalian embryos and fetuses, contends that local reflexes are the elementary units of behavior that combine secondarily to form integrated patterns. The conceptual and factual foundations of both theories are reappraised, and their limitations and shortcomings are indicated. It becomes evident that Coghill's concepts, derived from lower forms, cannot be generalized and extended to higher forms. On the other hand, the reflexogenic theory is unacceptable on theoretical and factual grounds. A reinvestigation of the embryology of behavior in the chick embryo has provided a new frame of reference that places the problem in a different perspective. An old observation of Preyer (1885) to the effect that overt motility is in operation several days before reflex circuits are formed has been followed up, and, in a series of observations and experiments, spontaneous, nonreflexogenic motility was established as a basic component of embryonic behavior. In can be shown that spontaneous motility patterns are not influenced by sensory input. Arguments are presented in favor of the idea that the spontaneous motility in the chick embryo is due to automatic, self-generated activity of neurons rather than to stimulation by agents in the circulation. One of the most significant characteristics of spontaneous motility is its rhythmicity: short phases of activity are followed by longer phases of inactivity. The analysis of recordings of the periodicity in normal embryos and in embryos with transected spinal cords has enabled us to dissociate a trigger mechanism for activation of motility from a device that determines the duration of the activity phases. Spontaneous and reflexogenic motility are regarded as two independent basic constituents of embryonic behavior. The former is considered to be the primary component, not only because it precedes the reflex responses in lower forms but mainly because reflex motility remains latent in the embryo owing to the absence of adequate stimuli; therefore, it cannot contribute to the molding of behavior patterns in prehatching and prenatal stages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/403941

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Hamburger, V.
Venue
The Quarterly Review of Biology
Published
1963-12
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
342-365
ISSN
  • 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-7718
OpenAlex
W2029088119
Cited by
261
References
14
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Aspects of the Embryology of Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/403941
The paper
Hamburger, V. (1963). Some Aspects of the Embryology of Behavior. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/403941

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.