The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Aspects of the Embryology of Behavior
Abstract
In the past, the development of behavior in vertebrate embryos has been interpreted in terms of two opposing viewpoints. Coghill, on the basis of his observations on the salamander Ambystoma, has maintained that behavior represents an integrated pattern from beginning to end; partial patterns segregate from total patterns by a developmental process which he calls "individuation." The opposing view, advocated by Windle and other students of the behavior of mammalian embryos and fetuses, contends that local reflexes are the elementary units of behavior that combine secondarily to form integrated patterns. The conceptual and factual foundations of both theories are reappraised, and their limitations and shortcomings are indicated. It becomes evident that Coghill's concepts, derived from lower forms, cannot be generalized and extended to higher forms. On the other hand, the reflexogenic theory is unacceptable on theoretical and factual grounds. A reinvestigation of the embryology of behavior in the chick embryo has provided a new frame of reference that places the problem in a different perspective. An old observation of Preyer (1885) to the effect that overt motility is in operation several days before reflex circuits are formed has been followed up, and, in a series of observations and experiments, spontaneous, nonreflexogenic motility was established as a basic component of embryonic behavior. In can be shown that spontaneous motility patterns are not influenced by sensory input. Arguments are presented in favor of the idea that the spontaneous motility in the chick embryo is due to automatic, self-generated activity of neurons rather than to stimulation by agents in the circulation. One of the most significant characteristics of spontaneous motility is its rhythmicity: short phases of activity are followed by longer phases of inactivity. The analysis of recordings of the periodicity in normal embryos and in embryos with transected spinal cords has enabled us to dissociate a trigger mechanism for activation of motility from a device that determines the duration of the activity phases. Spontaneous and reflexogenic motility are regarded as two independent basic constituents of embryonic behavior. The former is considered to be the primary component, not only because it precedes the reflex responses in lower forms but mainly because reflex motility remains latent in the embryo owing to the absence of adequate stimuli; therefore, it cannot contribute to the molding of behavior patterns in prehatching and prenatal stages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo
Hamburger, V., & Hamilton, H. L. (1951) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.1050880104 · Cited by 12,234
Self-citationRichards, T. W., & Carmichael, L. (1947) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1417884 · Cited by 621
Anatomy and the Problem of Behaviour.
(1929) · Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1929.02700470064040 · Cited by 501
A Manual of Experimental Embryology
(1943) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1943.02840110097038 · Cited by 309
SELF-DIFFERENTIATION OF THE BASIC PATTERNS OF COORDINATION
WEISS, P. (1968) · Dynamics of Development: Experiments and Inferences · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-2919-5.50027-1 · Cited by 305
Biochemistry of the Developing Nervous System
Palay, S. L. (1956) · PubMed Central · Cited by 246
The Prenatal Origin of Behavior
(1953) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/33.9.519a · Cited by 228
Observations and experiments on spontaneous rhythmical behavior in the chick embryo
Hamburger, V., & Balaban, M. (1963) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(63)90140-4 · Cited by 208
Self-citationThe prenatal development of behavior in the albino rat
Gonźlez, A. W. A. Y. (1932) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.900550205 · Cited by 146
The development of motility and behavior reactions in the toadfish (Opsanus tau)
Tracy, H. C. (1926) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.900400202 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Mechanisms underlying spontaneous patterned activity in developing neural circuits
Blankenship, A. G., & Feller, M. B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2759 · Cited by 851
The neurotrophic theory and naturally occurring motoneuron death
Oppenheim, R. W. (1989) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(89)90021-0 · Cited by 398
Development of the locomotor network in zebrafish
Drapeau, P., Saint-Amant, L., Buss, R. R., Chong, M., McDearmid, J. R., & Brustein, E. (2002) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00075-8 · Cited by 376
Fetal cyclic motor activity in diabetic pregnancies: Sensitivity to maternal blood glucose
Robertson, S. S., & Dierker, L. J. (2003) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.10045 · Cited by 285
Saint-Amant, L., & Drapeau, P. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00416-0 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamburger, V.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1963-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 342-365
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2029088119
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Aspects of the Embryology of Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/403941
- The paper
- Hamburger, V. (1963). Some Aspects of the Embryology of Behavior. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/403941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.