The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Evaluation of Narrow Hybrid Zones in Vertebrates
Abstract
A review of the literature on vertebrate hybridization reveals the existence of a number of narrow hybrid zones. Three hypotheses have been suggested to explain the occurrence of these zones. The ephemeral-zone hypothesis states that hybridization will end either in speciation or fusion of the hybridizing taxa by means of introgression. The dynamic-equilibrium hypothesis allows the possibility that narrow hybrid zones might be stable: where hybrids are confined to a small area by steep selection gradients, "crystalization" of an antihybridization mechanism might be prevented by naive immigrants from the parental populations eve though hybrids are selected against. The hybrid-superiority hypothesis states that hybrids are more fit than parental phenotypes in some environments. The ephemeral-zone hypothesis fails to explain the antiquity and apparent stability of several hybrid zones. The dynamic-equilibrium hypothesis does not adequately explain the persistence of hybrid populations that do not receive a substantial influx of genes from both parental populations. The hybrid-superiority hypothesis is consistent with the various sizes, shapes, and positions reported for stable hybrid zones because, under this hypothesis, the range of a hybrid population is determined by the range of environmental conditions within which the hybrids are superior. Although there are exceptions, most vertebrate hybrid zones are, in fact, narrow. The hybrid-superiority hypothesis must accommodate this fact. The additional hypothesis is offered that hybrids, in some cases, can succeed in environments where competition from parental phenotypes is weak. Thus, hybrid populations are often found in areas devoid of stable ecological communities. Ecotones are one such area, and I suggest that stable hybrid zones are often narrow because they tend to occur in ecotones which are themselves narrow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Cited by
Barton, N. H., & Hewitt, G. M. (1985) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000553 · Cited by 2,882
Hybridization and adaptive radiation
Seehausen, O. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.003 · Cited by 1,627
The role of hybridization in evolution
Barton, N. H. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x · Cited by 1,603
Hybrid origins of plant species
Rieseberg, L. H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.359 · Cited by 1,246
Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H., Archer, M. A., & Wayne, R. K. (1999) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6886170 · Cited by 820
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, W. S.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-277
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2088557578
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Evaluation of Narrow Hybrid Zones in Vertebrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/409995
- The paper
- Moore, W. S. (1977). An Evaluation of Narrow Hybrid Zones in Vertebrates. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/409995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.