The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concerted Evolution of Repetitive DNA Sequences in Eukaryotes
Abstract
A large fraction, sometimes the largest fraction, of a eukaryotic genome consists of repeated DNA sequences. Copy numbers range from several thousand to millions per diploid genome. All classes of repetitive DNA sequences examined to date exhibit apparently general, but little studied, patterns of "concerted evolution." Historically, concerted evolution has been defined as the nonindependent evolution of repetitive DNA sequences, resulting in a sequence similarity of repeating units that is greater within than among species. This intraspecific homogenization of repetitive sequence arrays is said to take place via the poorly understood mechanisms of "molecular drive." The evolutionary population dynamics of molecular drive remains largely unstudied in natural populations, and thus the potential significance of these evolutionary dynamics for population differentiation is unknown. This review attempts to demonstrate the potential importance of the mechanisms responsible for concerted evolution in the differentiation of populations. It contends that any natural grouping that is characterized by reproductive isolation and limited gene flow is capable of exhibiting concerted evolution of repetitive DNA arrays. Such effects are known to occur in protein and RNA-coding repetitive sequences, as well as in so-called "junk DNA," and thus have important implications for the differentiation and discrimination of natural populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene conversion: some implications for immunoglobulin genes
Baltimore, D. (1981) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90082-9 · Cited by 486
Cited by
Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cellsize, and the C‐value enigma
GREGORY, T. R. (2001) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2000.tb00059.x · Cited by 730
Phylogenetic Incongruence: Window into Genome History and Molecular Evolution
Wendel, J. F., & Doyle, J. J. (1998) · Molecular Systematics of Plants II · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_10 · Cited by 649
Detecting Regular Sound Changes in Linguistics as Events of Concerted Evolution
Hruschka, D. J., Branford, S., Smith, E. D., Wilkins, J., Meade, A., Pagel, M., & Bhattacharya, T. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.064 · Cited by 522
Human ribosomal RNA gene arrays display a broad range of palindromic structures
Caburet, S., Conti, C., Schurra, C., Lebofsky, R., Edelstein, S. J., & Bensimon, A. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3970105 · Cited by 143
Ramšak, A., Stopar, K., & Malej, A. (2012) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1053-9 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Elder, & Turner, B. J.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-320
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W1979821280
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concerted Evolution of Repetitive DNA Sequences in Eukaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/419073
- The paper
- Elder, & Turner, B. J. (1995). Concerted Evolution of Repetitive DNA Sequences in Eukaryotes. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/419073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.