Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Molecular Marker for Evaluating the Pathogenic Potential of Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes

Jacquet, Christine, Doumith, Michel, Gordon, Jeffrey I., Martin, Paul M. V., Cossart, Pascale, Lecuit, Marc·2004·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internalin mediates entry of Listeria monocytogenes into some human cultured cell lines and crossing of the intestinal barrier in transgenic mice expressing its receptor, human E-cadherin, in enterocytes. The relevance of these findings for humans is challenged by the observation that some L. monocytogenes isolates express a truncated nonfunctional form of internalin. METHODS: We investigated expression of internalin by use of immunoblot assay in 300 clinical strains obtained in France in a single year and a representative set of 150 strains obtained from food products during the same period. RESULTS: Clinical strains expressed full-length internalin far more frequently (288/300 strains [96%]) than did strains recovered from food products (98/150 strains [65%]; odds ratio, 12.73; 95% confidence interval, 6.27-26.34; P<1 x 10(-7)). All 61 strains (100%) from pregnancy-related cases, 55 (98%) of 56 strains from patients with central nervous system infections, and 151 (93%) of 162 strains from patients with bacteremia expressed full-length internalin. All 110 strains belonging to serovar 4b, the most frequently implicated serovar in human listeriosis, expressed full-length internalin. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the critical role of internalin in the pathogenesis of human listeriosis. It provides a molecular explanation for the predominance of serovar 4b among clinical strains and supports the usefulness of studying the expression of internalin as a marker of virulence in humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/420853

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Jacquet, C., Doumith, M., Gordon, J. I., Martin, P. M. V., Cossart, P., & Lecuit, M.
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-06
Volume
189
Issue
11
Pages
2094-2100
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2087908626
Cited by
254
References
1
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Molecular Marker for Evaluating the Pathogenic Potential of Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/420853
The paper
Jacquet, C., Doumith, M., Gordon, J. I., Martin, P. M. V., Cossart, P., & Lecuit, M. (2004). A Molecular Marker for Evaluating the Pathogenic Potential of Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/420853

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.