Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contrasting Cenozoic Lithospheric Evolution and Architecture in the Western and Eastern Sino‐Korean Craton: Constraints from Geochemistry of Basalts and Mantle Xenoliths

Xu, Yi‐Gang, Chung, Sun‐Lin, Ma, Jinlong, Shi, Lanbin·2004·The Journal of Geology

Abstract

Cenozoic basalts from both sides of the Daxin’anling‐Taihang gravity lineament that separates the Sino‐Korean craton (SKC) into western and eastern parts have been studied. In the western SKC, magmas evolved from xenolith‐bearing alkali basalts of Late Eocene–Oligocene age to coexisting alkali and tholeiitic basalts of Late Miocene–Quaternary age. This change in basalt type is accompanied by a decrease in La/Yb and an increase in Yb content. Sr‐Nd isotopic ratios and relative abundances on incompatible elements are consistent with a prevailing asthenospheric origin, although lithospheric mantle may have also contributed to these basalts. This temporal variation in basalt geochemistry is interpreted as reflecting progressive lithospheric thinning in the western SKC during the Cenozoic. An opposite trend is observed for Cenozoic basalts from the eastern SKC, suggesting lithospheric thickening during this time period. This thickening was probably related to regional thermal decay following peak magmatism in the Late Cretaceous–Early Tertiary. Such contrasting lithospheric processes may reflect diachronous extension in the SKC, with initial extension in the eastern part owing to the Late Mesozoic paleo‐Pacific subduction and subsequent extension in the western SKC induced by the Early Tertiary Indian‐Eurasian collision. An implication is that the lithospheric mantle in the western SKC is relatively old compared with that beneath the eastern SKC, which may be a mixture of old lithospheric relicts and newly accreted mantle. This predicted lithospheric architecture is consistent with Sr‐Nd isotopic data and recent Re‐Os age determinations from mantle xenoliths included in Cenozoic basalts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/422668

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Xu, Y., Chung, S., Ma, J., & Shi, L.
Venue
The Journal of Geology
Published
2004-09
Volume
112
Issue
5
Pages
593-605
ISSN
  • 0022-1376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5269
OpenAlex
W2082627141
Cited by
180
References
1
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrasting Cenozoic Lithospheric Evolution and Architecture in the Western and Eastern Sino‐Korean Craton: Constraints from Geochemistry of Basalts and Mantle Xenoliths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/422668
The paper
Xu, Y., Chung, S., Ma, J., & Shi, L. (2004). Contrasting Cenozoic Lithospheric Evolution and Architecture in the Western and Eastern Sino‐Korean Craton: Constraints from Geochemistry of Basalts and Mantle Xenoliths. The Journal of Geology. https://doi.org/10.1086/422668

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.