The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Present‐Day Growth of Black Holes and Bulges: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Perspective
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the accretion-driven growth of supermassive black holes in the low-redshift universe using 23,000 narrow-emission-line ("type 2") active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and the complete sample of 123,000 galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey from which they were drawn. We use the stellar velocity dispersions of the early-type galaxies and AGN hosts to estimate their black hole masses, and we use the AGN [O III] λ5007 emission line luminosities to estimate black hole accretion rates. We find that most present-day accretion occurs onto black holes with masses less than 10 8 M ☉ that reside in moderately massive galaxies ( M * ≈ 10 10 -10 11.5 M ☉ ) with high stellar surface mass densities (μ * ≈ 10 8.5 -10 9.5 M ☉ kpc -2 ) and young stellar populations. The volume-averaged accretion rates of low-mass black holes (<3 × 10 7 M ☉ ) imply that this population is growing on a timescale that is comparable to the age of the universe. Around half this growth takes place in AGNs that are radiating within a factor of 5 of the Eddington luminosity. Such systems are rare, making up only 0.2% of the low-mass black hole population at the present day. The rest of the growth occurs in lower luminosity AGNs. The growth timescale is more than 2 orders of magnitude longer for the population of the most massive black holes in our sample. The volume-averaged ratio of star formation to black hole accretion in bulge-dominated galaxies is ~1000, in remarkable agreement with the observed ratio of stellar mass to black hole mass in nearby galaxy bulges. We conclude that (1) bulge formation and black hole formation are tightly coupled, even in present-day galaxies, and (2) the evolution of the AGN luminosity function documented in recent optical and X-ray surveys is driven by a decrease in the characteristic mass scale of actively accreting black holes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033 · cited 1×
“The imaging is conducted in the u, g, r, i, and z bands (Fukugita et al. 1996; Smith et al. 2002) using a drift scan camera (Gunn et al. 1998).”
MethodThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera
Gunn, J. E., Carr, M., Rockosi, C., Sekiguchi, M., Berry, K., Elms, B., de Haas, E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G., Lupton, R., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300645 · Cited by 1,692
Astrometric Calibration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Pier, J. R., Munn, J. A., Hindsley, R. B., Hennessy, G. S., Kent, S. M., Lupton, R. H., & Ivezić, Ž. (2003) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/346138 · Cited by 908
Cited by
LaMassa, S. M., Cales, S., Moran, E. C., Myers, A. D., Richards, G. T., Eracleous, M., Heckman, T. M., Gallo, L., & Urry, C. M. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/2/144 · Cited by 451
Self-citationA systematic search for changing-look quasars in SDSS
MacLeod, C. L., Ross, N. P., Lawrence, A., Goad, M., Horne, K., Burgett, W., Chambers, K. C., Flewelling, H., Hodapp, K., Kaiser, N., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2997 · Cited by 323
Impact of supermassive black hole growth on star formation
Harrison, C. M. (2017) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0165 · Cited by 319
Martin, D. C., Wyder, T. K., Schiminovich, D., Barlow, T. A., Forster, K., Friedman, P. G., Morrissey, P., Neff, S. G., Seibert, M., Small, T., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/516639 · Cited by 312
Self-citationKuo, C. Y., Braatz, J. A., Condon, J. J., Impellizzeri, C. M. V., Lo, K. Y., Zaw, I., Schenker, M., Henkel, C., Reid, M. J., & Greene, J. E. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/727/1/20 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., Tremonti, C., & White, S. D. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-09-20
- Volume
- 613
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-118
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2081248194
- Cited by
- 840
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Present‐Day Growth of Black Holes and Bulges: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/422872
- The paper
- Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., Tremonti, C., & White, S. D. M. (2004). Present‐Day Growth of Black Holes and Bulges: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Perspective. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/422872
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.