Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High‐Redshift Supernova Rates

Open access
Dahlen, Tomas, Strolger, Louis‐Gregory, Riess, Adam G., Mobasher, Bahram, Chary, Ranga‐Ram, Conselice, Christopher J., Ferguson, Henry C., Fruchter, Andrew S., Giavalisco, Mauro, Livio, Mario, Madau, Piero, Panagia, Nino, Tonry, John L.·2004·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We use a sample of 42 supernovae detected with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on board the Hubble Space Telescope as part of the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey to measure the rate of core-collapse supernovae to z ~ 0.7 and Type Ia supernovae to z ~ 1.6. This significantly increases the redshift range at which supernova rates have been estimated from observations. The rate of core-collapse supernovae can be used as an independent probe of the cosmic star formation rate. Based on the observations of 17 core-collapse supernovae, we measure an increase in the core-collapse supernova rate by a factor of ~1.6 in the range 0.3 < z < 0.7 and an overall increase by a factor of ~7 to z ~ 0.7 in comparison with the local core-collapse supernova rate. The increase in the rate in this redshift range is consistent with recent measurements of the star formation rate derived from UV-luminosity densities and IR data sets. Based on 25 Type Ia supernovae, we find a Type Ia supernova rate that is a factor of 3-5 higher at z ~ 1 compared to earlier estimates at lower redshifts ( z < 0.5), implying that the Type Ia supernova rate traces a higher star formation rate at redshifts z > 1 compared to low redshift. At higher redshift ( z ≳ 1), we find a suggested decrease in the Type Ia rate with redshift. This evolution of the Ia rate with redshift is consistent with a Type Ia progenitor model, in which there is a substantial delay between the formation of the progenitor star and the explosion of the supernova. Assuming that the Type Ia progenitor stars have initial main-sequence masses 3 M ☉ < M < 8 M ☉ , we find that 5%-7% of the available progenitors explode as Type Ia supernovae.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/422899

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Dahlen, T., Strolger, L., Riess, A. G., Mobasher, B., Chary, R., Conselice, C. J., Ferguson, H. C., Fruchter, A. S., Giavalisco, M., Livio, M., Madau, P., Panagia, N., & Tonry, J. L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2004-09-20
Volume
613
Issue
1
Pages
189-199
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2148383454
Cited by
252
References
2
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐Redshift Supernova Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/422899
The paper
Dahlen, T., Strolger, L., Riess, A. G., Mobasher, B., Chary, R., Conselice, C. J., Ferguson, H. C., Fruchter, A. S., Giavalisco, M., Livio, M., Madau, P., Panagia, N., & Tonry, J. L. (2004). High‐Redshift Supernova Rates. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/422899

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.