The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diffuse Galactic Continuum Gamma Rays: A Model Compatible with EGRET Data and Cosmic‐Ray Measurements
Open accessAbstract
We present a study of the compatibility of some current models of the diffuse Galactic continuum γ-rays with EGRET data. A set of regions sampling the whole sky is chosen to provide a comprehensive range of tests. The range of EGRET data used is extended to 100 GeV. The models are computed with our GALPROP cosmic-ray propagation and γ-ray production code. We confirm that the "conventional model" based on the locally observed electron and nucleon spectra is inadequate, for all sky regions. A conventional model plus hard sources in the inner Galaxy is also inadequate, since this cannot explain the GeV excess away from the Galactic plane. Models with a hard electron injection spectrum are inconsistent with the local spectrum even considering the expected fluctuations; they are also inconsistent with the EGRET data above 10 GeV. We present a new model that fits the spectrum in all sky regions adequately. Secondary antiproton data were used to fix the Galactic average proton spectrum, while the electron spectrum is adjusted using the spectrum of diffuse emission itself. The derived electron and proton spectra are compatible with those measured locally considering fluctuations due to energy losses, propagation, or possibly details of Galactic structure. This model requires a much less dramatic variation in the electron spectrum than models with a hard electron injection spectrum, and moreover it fits the γ-ray spectrum better and to the highest EGRET energies. It gives a good representation of the latitude distribution of the γ-ray emission from the plane to the poles, and of the longitude distribution. We show that secondary positrons and electrons make an essential contribution to Galactic diffuse γ-ray emission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE LARGE AREA TELESCOPE ON THE FERMI GAMMA-RAY SPACE TELESCOPE MISSION
Atwood, W. B., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Althouse, W., Anderson, B., Axelsson, M., Baldini, L., Ballet, J., Band, D. L., Barbiellini, G., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1071 · Cited by 4,198
Self-citationTHE SPECTRUM AND MORPHOLOGY OF THE FERMI BUBBLES
Ackermann, M., Albert, A., Atwood, W. B., Baldini, L., Ballet, J., Barbiellini, G., Bastieri, D., Bellazzini, R., Bissaldi, E., Blandford, R. D., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/793/1/64 · Cited by 328
Self-citationA New Determination of the Extragalactic Diffuse Gamma‐Ray Background from EGRET Data
Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., & Reimer, O. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/423196 · Cited by 320
Self-citationPolarized radio filaments outside the Galactic plane
Vidal, M., Dickinson, C., Davies, R. D., & Leahy, J. P. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1328 · Cited by 88
Eby, J., & Takhistov, V. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.00100 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., & Reimer, O.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 613
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 962-976
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1979574487
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffuse Galactic Continuum Gamma Rays: A Model Compatible with EGRET Data and Cosmic‐Ray Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/423193
- The paper
- Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V., & Reimer, O. (2004). Diffuse Galactic Continuum Gamma Rays: A Model Compatible with EGRET Data and Cosmic‐Ray Measurements. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/423193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.