Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 480

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global‐Scale Turbulent Convection and Magnetic Dynamo Action in the Solar Envelope

Open access
Brun, Allan Sacha, Miesch, Mark S., Toomre, Juri·2004·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The operation of the solar global dynamo appears to involve many dynamical elements, including the generation of fields by the intense turbulence of the deep convection zone, the transport of these fields into the tachocline region near the base of the convection zone, the storage and amplification of toroidal fields in the tachocline by differential rotation, and the destabilization and emergence of such fields due to magnetic buoyancy. Self-consistent magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations that realistically incorporate all of these processes are not yet computationally feasible, although some elements can now be studied with reasonable fidelity. Here we consider the manner in which turbulent compressible convection within the bulk of the solar convection zone can generate large-scale magnetic fields through dynamo action. We accomplish this through a series of three-dimensional numerical simulations of MHD convection within rotating spherical shells using our anelastic spherical harmonic (ASH) code on massively parallel supercomputers. Since differential rotation is a key ingredient in all dynamo models, we also examine here the nature of the rotation profiles that can be sustained within the deep convection zone as strong magnetic fields are built and maintained. We find that the convection is able to maintain a solar-like angular velocity profile despite the influence of Maxwell stresses, which tend to oppose Reynolds stresses and thus reduce the latitudinal angular velocity contrast throughout the convection zone. The dynamo-generated magnetic fields exhibit a complex structure and evolution, with radial fields concentrated in downflow lanes and toroidal fields organized into twisted ribbons that are extended in longitude and achieve field strengths of up to 5000 G. The flows and fields exhibit substantial kinetic and magnetic helicity although systematic hemispherical patterns are only apparent in the former. Fluctuating fields dominate the magnetic energy and account for most of the back-reaction on the flow via Lorentz forces. Mean fields are relatively weak and do not exhibit systematic latitudinal propagation or periodic polarity reversals as in the Sun. This may be attributed to the absence of a tachocline, i.e., a penetrative boundary layer between the convection zone and the deeper radiative interior possessing strong rotational shear. The influence of such a layer will await subsequent studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/423835

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 480

Metadata

Authors
Brun, A. S., Miesch, M. S., & Toomre, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2004-10-20
Volume
614
Issue
2
Pages
1073-1098
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2123160401
Cited by
480
References
2
FWCI
13.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global‐Scale Turbulent Convection and Magnetic Dynamo Action in the Solar Envelope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/423835
The paper
Brun, A. S., Miesch, M. S., & Toomre, J. (2004). Global‐Scale Turbulent Convection and Magnetic Dynamo Action in the Solar Envelope. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/423835

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.