Cited by 677Language and CultureLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesCategorization, perception, and language

“Cultural” Concepts and the Language‐Culture Nexus

Silverstein, Michael·2004·Current Anthropology

Abstract

Events of language use mediate human sociality. Such semiotic occasions develop, sustain, or transform at least part—some have argued the greater part—of people's conceptualizations of their universe. Reserving the term cultural concepts for such sociocentric aspects of human cognition, this article sketches linguistic anthropology's methods for discovering truly cultural conceptualizations, illustrated at the polar extremes of ritual efficacy (Christianity's Eucharistic liturgy) and of everyday conversational language games. Knowledge schemata structuring cultural concepts, here termed ‐onomic knowledge, turn out to be “in play” in interaction, made relevant to it as interactants use verbal and perilinguistic signs in the work of aligning as relationally identifiable kinds of persons. In interactional experience, ‐onomic knowledge anchoring cultural concepts is always implicit and is even sometimes part of largely abstract cultural patterns only indirectly experienceable by people such as the cultural “edibility” of fauna in Thai villagers' cultural concept invoked by use of terms denoting animals. Furthermore, beyond unique micro‐contextual occasions of interaction, one discerns a macro‐sociology of ‐onomic knowledge. Privileged ritual sites of usage anchor such a multiplex social formation; their emanations constitute power—frequently politicoeconomic— to warrant or license usage of particular verbal forms (e.g., American English “wine‐talk” register) with particular meani…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/423971

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Words lack inherent meaning; their meaning is socially motivated and constructed.

    “Words do not have inherent meaning, nor do they do anything in and of themselves.Words are instruments of communication whose meaning is socially motivated and constructed, and not autonomous.”

    From Unrecognized Prophetic Ostracon from Ḥorvat ʿUza (2021) · cites this paper as Silverstein 2004

  • Some linguistic features gain greater social salience over time.

    “This means that some vernacular features achieve greater social salience over time; for example, the choice to use honorifics (such as the use of usted versus tu in Spanish) communicates social meaning far more than any kind of referential or denotational meaning.”

    From Unrecognized Prophetic Ostracon from Ḥorvat ʿUza (2021) · cites this paper as Silverstein 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silverstein, M.
Corresponding author
Silverstein, Michael
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
2004-12
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
621-652
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W2135680998
Cited by
677
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 32
FWCI
45.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
cultural concepts, linguistic anthropology, ritual efficacy, Eucharistic liturgy, everyday conversation, social power, animal vocabulary, verbal and nonverbal interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review