Cited by 3,706School Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools

Altonji, Joseph G., Elder, Todd E., Taber, Christopher R.·2005·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

In this paper we measure the effect of Catholic high school attendance on educational attainment and test scores. Because we do not have a good instrumental variable for Catholic school attendance, we develop new estimation methods based on the idea that the amount of selection on the observed explanatory variables in a model provides a guide to the amount of selection on the unobservables. We also propose an informal way to assess selectivity bias based on measuring the ratio of selection on unobservables to selection on observables that would be required if one is to attribute the entire effect of Catholic school attendance to selection bias. We use our methods to estimate the effect of attending a Catholic high school on a variety of outcomes. Our main conclusion is that Catholic high schools substantially increase the probability of graduating from high school and, more tentatively, attending college. We find little evidence of an effect on test scores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/426036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oster (2019) and Altonji, Elder and Taber (2005) provide conditions under which stability of coefficients to observable controls can help rule out selection on unobservables.

    “Moreover, Oster (2019) and Altonji, Elder and Taber (2005) provide conditions under which the stability of coefficients to the inclusion of observable controls can also help rule out selection on unobservables.”

    From Still Waters, Rapid Currents: Early Labor Market Transformation under Generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as Altonji, Elder and Taber (2005)

  • Selection-on-unobservables bounding methods show that an implausibly large degree of sorting on unobservables would be needed to explain away the estimated effects of absences on high school completion and college enrollment.

    “We apply selection-on-unobservables bounding methods to our baseline value-added models to show that an implausibly large degree of sorting on unobservables is needed to explain away the estimated effects of absences on high school completion and college enrollment”

    From The short- and long-run impacts of secondary school absences (2021) · cites this paper as Altonji et al., 2005

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 3,706

Authors
Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2005-02
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
151-184
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W2100673825
Cited by
3,706
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 231 · 2025: 267 · 2024: 241 · 2023: 248 · 2022: 268 · 2021: 271 · 2020: 253 · 2019: 235 · 2018: 224 · 2017: 186 · 2016: 205 · 2015: 205 · 2014: 162 · 2013: 144 · 2012: 127
FWCI
235.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
Catholic schools, school choice, selection bias, high school graduation, college attendance, test scores, educational attainment, estimation methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review