The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Review of Twenty Years’ Use of the Resource‐Ratio Theory
Abstract
A model of species interactions based on their use of shared resources was proposed in 1972 by Robert MacArthur and later expanded in an article (1980) and a book (1982) by David Tilman. This "resource-ratio theory" has been used to make a number of testable predictions about competition and community patterns. We reviewed 1,333 papers that cite Tilman's two publications to determine whether predictions of the resource-ratio theory have been adequately tested and to summarize their general conclusions. Most of the citations do not directly test the theory: only 26 studies provide well-designed tests of one or more predictions, resulting in 42 individual tests of predictions. Most of these tests were conducted in the laboratory or experimental microcosms and used primary producers in freshwater systems. Overall, the predictions of the resource-ratio theory were supported 75% of the time. One of the primary predictions of the model, that species dominance varies with the ratio of resource availabilities, was supported by 13 of 16 tests, but most other predictions have been insufficiently tested. We suggest that more experimental work in a variety of natural systems is seriously needed, especially studies designed to test predictions related to resource supply and consumption rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients
Tilman, D. (1987) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937080 · Cited by 1,076
Experimental Studies on the Struggle for Existence
Gause, G. F. (1932) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.9.4.389 · Cited by 401
Cited by
The Park Grass Experiment 1856-2006: Its contribution to ecology
SILVERTOWN, J., POULTON, P., JOHNSTON, E., EDWARDS, G., HEARD, M., & BISS, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01145.x · Cited by 461
Linking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory
Letten, A. D., Ke, P., & Fukami, T. (2017) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1242 · Cited by 363
Cardinale, B. J., Hillebrand, H., Harpole, W. S., Gross, K., & Ptacnik, R. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01317.x · Cited by 249
Resource Acquisition and Animal Response in Dynamic Landscapes
BISSONETTE, J. A. (2007) · Temporal Dimensions of Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-45447-4_2 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, T. E., Burns, J. H., Munguia, P., Walters, E. L., Kneitel, J. M., Richards, P. M., Mouquet, N., & Buckley, H. L.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 439-448
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2202209669
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Review of Twenty Years’ Use of the Resource‐Ratio Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/428681
- The paper
- Miller, T. E., Burns, J. H., Munguia, P., Walters, E. L., Kneitel, J. M., Richards, P. M., Mouquet, N., & Buckley, H. L. (2005). A Critical Review of Twenty Years’ Use of the Resource‐Ratio Theory. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/428681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.