Cited by 19Library Science and AdministrationMuseums and Cultural HeritageLibrary Science and Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Partnerships and Collaboration among Public Libraries, Public Broadcast Media, and Museums: Current Context and Future Potential

Abstract

This article reports one part of a project that examined collaborations among public institutions providing informal lifelong learning opportunities to children and adults in the United States. It presents the results of a survey of chief executive officers and staff of public libraries, museums, public television stations, and public radio stations that investigated the extent and nature of collaborations between and among these institutions and forces driving or preventing collaboration. There are some potentially interesting asymmetries in the responses among organizations, suggesting that enhanced awareness among these institutions of institution‐specific types of resources can allow such institutions to partner and build on each other’s strengths and skills.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/428692

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. D’Elia George, 2003, School of Informatics
  2. Walker Chris, 2003, Partnerships for Free Choice Learning
  3. Hirzy Ellen Cochran, 1992, Excellence and Equity: Education and the Public Dimension of Museums
  4. Smithsonian Institution, 1998, Museum Reference Center Bibliography: Collaboration
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Office of Grants and Special Programs., 1994, Science Museums: Creating Partnerships in Science Education
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Office of Grants and Special Programs., 1994, Science Museums: Enlisting Communities in Science Education Partnerships
  7. Hirzy Ellen Cochran, 1996, True Needs
  8. American Association of Museums Staff., 2002, Mastering Civic Engagement: A Challenge to Museums
  9. Aeffect, Institute of Museum and Library Services: Identification and Analysis of Library and Museum Partnerships. Executive Summary
  10. Sledge Jane, 1999, Conference Proceedings, chap. 7 (Imperial College
  11. American Library Directory, 2001, New York: Bowker, 1
  12. American Association of Museums., 2001, The Official Museum Directory
  13. Urban Libraries Council, 2000, Membership Directory
  14. D’Elia George, 2003, School of Informatics

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rodger, E. J., Jörgensen, C., & D’Elia, G.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
The Library Quarterly
Published
2005-01
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
42-66
ISSN
  • 0024-2519 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-652X
OpenAlex
W2088499344
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Library Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
Keywords
inter-institutional collaboration, public libraries, museums, public service broadcasting, children's learning, adult learning, organizational partnerships, barriers to collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review